Posted on

Lead Ammo Ban Coming

06.11.14

A Ban On Lead Ammo Is On The Horizon

“There is no proposal to ban or limit use of lead ammunition in Oregon, but developments outside of Oregon could affect the use of lead ammunition within the state,” 

Don’t you believe it.

“The California legislature passed a law banning lead ammunition to protect endangered California condors…”

“Historically, Oregon has had condors, though none are known to live here now, however, there are efforts to re-establish populations in northern California and if they are successful, it is only a matter of time before condors begin frequenting the southern portions of Oregon. “

Rest assured this will be the excuse needed to ban lead ammo.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is working with Oregon State University to “survey a random sample” of Oregon hunters “about their use and knowledge of lead ammunition.”

While you most likely will not be included in the survey, you can still make your voice heard.

“Persons not chosen for the survey are welcome to provide comments on lead ammunition directly to the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife at a special email address: ODFW.Wildlife@state.or.us”

For more info please see this link.  

Posted on

Early Summer Update 06.09.14

With the primary elections behind us, and the summer having arrived, it’s time to catch up.


First of course, are the results of the primary elections. 

Dr Monica Wehby will be facing anti-gun radical Jeff Merkley for US Senate.  While we endorsed Wehby’s opponent, Jason Conger, we wish her the best in this important race.

Oregon Congressional races will be interesting. 

In the First Congressional District, Suzanne Bonamici (who made a career of anti-gun activism when she served in the Oregon Legislature) will be facing  Jason Yates who is a staunch supporter of gun rights.

In the Second District, Greg Walden has once again secured the endorsement of the NRA in spite of his anti-gun votes.  

In the Third District, Earl Blumenauer, one of the most militant anti-gun extremists in the Congress, faces no real opposition.

In the Fourth, long time incumbent Peter DeFazio will once again be running against (and no doubt defaming) Art Robinson. Robinson is a staunch supporter of gun rights and an OFF member. DeFazio is a hard core leftist who is long past his expiration date in Congress.

The Fifth District race may be the oddest.

Incumbent Democrat Kurt Schrader will be facing Tootie Smith who is a Clackamas County Commissioner.  Schrader has been an open supporter of more restrictive gun control yet he, once again, has received the endorsement of the NRA, who in their candidate ratings completely ignored the fact that there were two pro-gun candidatesrunning in the Republican Primary.  Schrader, a Democrat, got the NRA endorsement and Republicans Tootie Smith and Ben Pollock, both pro-gun, were never even mentioned.

Smith won that primary against newcomer Pollock and will have an uphill climb against Schrader, a millionaire with an NRA endorsement despite his anti-gun record.

Now onto the battle for control of the Oregon Legislature.

If there were any races you missed, you can see complete results here.

There are some races we’ll be watching closely in the general election. 

In Oregon Senate District 3, OFF-supported Dave Dotterrer will once again face off with anti-gun Alan Bates.  In their last match up, Dave came very close to defeating Bates and we think he has an even better chance this time. Bates is totally out of touch and needs to be replaced.In Senate Distict 4, anti-gun militant Floyd Prozanski will face newcomer Cheryl Mueller. Mueller is the daughter of former Senator Gary George and the sister of current Senator Larry George. Both Gary and Larry have been consistent supporters of gun rights. Our hope is that it runs in the family.

Senate District 8 will be between current House member Sara Gelser and Betsy Close, who holds the seat now. Close was appointed to this seat and will now be running to keep it. Close was endorsed by OFF and when she served in the Oregon House was a rock solid supporter of gun rights.  Gelser is best known for her attempts to ban firearms ownership by foster parents.

In Senate District 11, current Senate President Peter Courtney is being challenged by Patti Milne. Courtney is fiercely anti-gun and best known for his use of dirty tricks and unethical behavior to promote his radical agenda.  Milne recently resigned her seat as Marion County Commissioner to run against Courtney. Milne is supported by OFF and is 100% pro-gun.   When she served in the Oregon House in the 90’s Milne introduced Oregon’s first Constitutional Carry bill. She is truly a pioneer for gun rights in Oregon.

In Senate District 13, our hero, House Rep Kim Thatcher, is running against Democrat Ryan Howard. Thatcher has been perhaps Oregon’s most prolific creator of pro-gun legislation. It was her dogged efforts that brought us privacy for CHL holders. She is running to fill the seat being vacated by Senator Larry George.

In House District 9 pro-gun activist Casey Runyan will be taking on Caddy McKeown. Casey got lots of media attention when he openly challenged the presence of anti-gun celebrity Mark Kelly at a hearing for an anti-gun bill in Salem.

In House District 25, our pick, radio talk show host Bill Post, beat Barbara Jensen who had been recruited by Julie Parrish who thought Post was too conservative. Post won handily and has no Democratic opponent. While a third party candidate could still file to run, at this time it looks like Bill will win this seat which is being vacated by Kim Thatcher who is running for Senate.

House District 28 will almost certainly be won by Democrat Jeff Barker whose Republican opponent dropped out of the race.  Barker has been one of the strongest supporters of gun rights the Oregon House has seen in a long time. Barker has repeatedly taken on his own party to protect Second Amendment in Oregon. 

House District 41, previously held by anti-gun extremist Carolyn Tomei will see a race between Kathleen Taylor (D) and Tim Mc Menamin.(R)  Tim is an OFF member and solid pro-gun supporter.

Many seats will have only one candidate running. There are 24 races with no Republican candidate and 10 with no Democratic candidate.

On another note, OFF will be raffling another rifle. It’s an AR donated by our friends at RRC Firearms and you can get all the details here.

If you are in the Cottage Grove area on June 14th, please consider coming to “Incite Liberty!” at the Western Oregon Exposition Fairgrounds. OFF will be there along with some great speakers and supporters of freedom. All the details are here. 

Finally, we’d like to remind you that there is now a great way to support our efforts at the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation that won’t cost you a penny.

If you shop at Fred Meyers, they will contribute to our Foundation if you use a Rewards Card. You don’t lose any of your points! You keep them all and they donate to OFEF. Hard to beat that deal.  It’s easy to sign up and all the details are here

Now get out there and enjoy the weather! 

Posted on

OFEF SUBMITS AMICUS BRIEF AGAINST CT. GUN BAN

05.24.14

Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation and Gun Owners of American Fighting Connecticut Gun Ban

OFEF has contributed to an amicus brief in a lawsuit against Connecticut’s unconstitutional firearms and magazine ban. You can read it here.

As attempts are made across the country to eliminate your Second Amendment rights, it is more and more critical that we engage the gun grabbers in court.

“That rifle on the wall of the labourer’s cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
– George Orwell

Posted on

We’re Having A Party

03.24.14

Well, we’re  not really having it, but our friends are and you’re invited.

As you know, the City of Ashland is considering Portland style restrictions on gun owners. In spite of the fact that “open carry” has never been an issue there, the City Council is preparing to bow to the pressure of a small group of malcontents who would feel safer and be less offended if all firearms were hidden from view and good people were prohibited from protecting themselves.

Despite the fact that the proposed ordinances would not in any way affect CHL holders and despite the fact that those without CHL’s could still openly carry firearms if they were unloaded, some folks are just always looking for a way to attack your rights. They’re not doing it to stop crime. They’re not doing it because there is any kind of problem in Ashland. They’re just doing it because they think they can.

But not everyone in Ashland is so mindlessly fearful and many are stepping up to respond to this pointless attack.They’ve asked us to reach out to you and invite you to an “Open Carry” day in Ashland on March 29th.

It’s not a rally, it’s just an opportunity for people who believe in liberty to get together, meet, and enjoy the company of other patriots. There will be food (free!) and an opportunity to sign their pro-gun petition. You can drop off a donation of  food for the Ashland Food Bank.

You can download all the details here Ashland Open Day 29th.

Whether you can make it or not our friends in Ashland ask that you drop one more note to the City Council  expressing your views on their proposed ordinance.

Please take a moment to like the Ashland activists’ brand new Facebook page and visit their webpage.

This event is intended to be a opportunity to make friends  and promote freedom.  Remember, “open carry” is not just a way of making a statement. For some, it’s their only option to stay safe. Would you want your 20 year old daughter denied the right to protect herself because of the baseless fears of a few ignorant people?

Come on out, join the fun,and say “no” to disarming the good guys.

Sample message follows to the City Council follows.

_______________________________________To the Ashland City Council,Please vote no on any ordinance that denies people the ability to stay safe while in your city.

Banning “loaded carry” in Ashland will have no effect on crime. But it will deny many people the right to defend themselves.

I urge you to keep Ashland safe. Vote “no” on restricting the rights of gun owners.

_____________________________________________________________________

oldpistol

Posted on

More on Portland Slime Moving South

03.19.14

Last night, the Ashland City Council held another meeting to consider adopting Portland style gun restrictions.

The meeting, described as “standing room only,” drew gun rights activists opposing the ordinance and anti-gunners determined to convince the city to enact new restrictions.

The irony of the whole issue is that Ashland has never been a place where open carry was either common or a problem of any kind.  The people behind the proposed new abuses of civil rights were not responding to crime, threats or even real events. They simply saw Ashland as fertile ground for new attacks on liberty.

It’s this reality that may become the great vindication of the open carry movement.  There are many (even gun owners) who have complained that open carry is an unnecessary provocation that will bring on unwanted attention and new regulations. However, open carry has never been an issue in Ashland and the rights of gun owners are still under attack.  One has to wonder what the benefit of avoiding “provocation” is, if places like Ashland will bow to the pressure of a few malcontents to create pointless and unneeded new restrictions.

In fact, as several city council members correctly pointed out, the successful passage of an ordinance of this kind, in a place where even the police concede it serves no purpose, could well make Ashland a magnet for those who chose to send a message by openly carrying legal firearms.

Remember, those with concealed handgun licenses will still be able to open carry virtually anywhere. Those without licenses may still carry as long as the firearm is not loaded. If the mere sight of an openly carried gun is giving some Ashland residents the chills, enacting this ordinance will accomplish nothing except encouraging open carry by protestors.  The local police will then be in the very unenviable position of having to figure out what their “reasonable suspicion” will be every time they want to stop someone with a firearm.  It’s hard to imagine that the police will consider this a good use of their time.

OPB reported the crowd was “mostly respectful” without giving any examples of any incidents, but gun owners who were present told us that one council member, Carol Vosin (the main proponent of the ordinance) received an escort to her car after the meeting, by men openly carrying firearms. (The local police of course.)

It was this same hypocrite who testified in the past that stopping gun owners would be no different than drunk driving checkpoints before it was pointed out to her that those are not legal in Oregon.

You can see other reports on the meeting here, here and here.

The council has requested another draft of the proposed ordinance, this time with no added restrictions of guns carried in vehicles. So we are making headway, but we still need to do all we can to kill this senseless assault on freedom.

Please consider another message to the Council.

Sample message follows.
_______________________________________

To the Ashland City Council,

I find it amazing that you would devote so much time to considering an ordinance banning the loaded carry of firearms in Ashland. No one has been able to demonstrate that this is even an issue in the city and your own police have told you it’s not a problem. But you seem determined to MAKE it a problem. Please keep in mind, if you pass this pointless and unneeded ordinance, license holders may still openly carry firearms and those without licenses may still openly carry firearms that you and your police will have no way of knowing are loaded or not without constant and possibly illegal stops by law enforcement.  Those who are offended by, or fearful of, the sight of an openly carried gun will continue to be offended and afraid and you will succeed in making Ashland the perfect gathering place for proponents of open carry. I can assure you most of them will carry openly and spend no money.

Surely your time could be better spent addressing real problems. Open carry is not one of them.
_______________________________________________________________________________________

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.” – Richard Henry Lee

Posted on

Ashland To Hear Anti-Gun Ordinances (Again!)

03.12.14

We have been informed that on Tuesday March 18, the Ashland City Council will (once again) consider adopting Portland style gun restrictions.These pointless regulations are intended only to harass legitimate gun owners and will have no effect on law-breakers.The Council meeting starts at 7PM and will be at the Ashland Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main St. If you cannot be at this meeting, consider sending a message to the Ashland City Council.

An excellent article about this assault on gun rights can be seen here.

 

A sample message follows:

_____________________________________________

 

To the Ashland City Council:

I strongly object to any proposed ordinance that creates or expands restrictions on law-abiding gun owners in Ashland. Not only do you risk running afoul of Oregon’s preemption statute and exposing yourself to costly litigation, but you send a message to the most law-abiding segment of our society that they should visit and spend money elsewhere.

I urge you not to consider any new restriction on gun owners.

Posted on

They’re Done, We Won!

03.07.14

The 2014 Oregon Legislature has adjourned. In spite of a flurry of last minute maneuvers the anti-rights crowd failed to pass their gun registration scheme, or anything else.

There is one, and only one, reason for that. You. In a story in today’s Oregonian, OFF members were singled out as the driving force behind the activism that killed SB 1551, Prozanski’s gun registration bill.

You have much to be proud of. Not only did you kill that very dangerous bill, but your efforts helped us pass two pro-gun bills.
We’ll have more to say about the session in the coming days, but for now, take a moment to pat yourself on the back.

You did it…again.

Posted on

03.06.14 Update On SB 1551

The twists and turns of SB 1551 are continuing.

The bill started life as an attempt by Floyd Prosanzki and other anti-rights legislators to create a universal gun registration scheme in Oregon of the type being used in other states to confiscate guns from people whose only crime was owning Constitutionally-protected firearms.

If passed, SB 1551 would prohibit you from giving or loaning a gun to your best friend, or even your girlfriend.

Although Prozanski denied that the bill would have that effect, his own attorneys said it was true.

Because of the tireless efforts of gun owners, the bill stalled in the Senate Judiciary Committee. It was sent to the Senate Rules Committee because that committee stays open after others have closed.

This was an effort to keep the bill alive long enough for the sponsors to twist arms or figure out some other way to get it passed.  When it looked like they had no hope, Prozanski proposed to “gut and stuff” the bill with entirely new and unrelated language. His new proposed language can be seen here.

The new language has nothing to do with the original bill, but because the original version had a public hearing, the new bill can be moved with no public input at all. In this way the legislature can pass bills without your having any opportunity to testify for or against the bill. That’s how things are done in Salem.

So what would the new bill do?

The universal background checks and registration that the proponents claimed were essential are gone.  In their place, new restrictions have been added to prohibit persons with “mental disorders” who have been ordered by the court to submit to “outpatient” treatment from purchasing or possessing firearms.

Oregon law already allows the court to prohibit persons with “mental illness” from having or buying firearms. (ORS 426.130), so what does this expansion to “mental disorders” mean?

According to Legislative Counsel, the lawyers for the legislature, “mental disorder” is not defined.

In ORS 426.005 a person with a “mental illness” is defined as:

“a person who, because of a mental disorder, is one or more of the following:

(A) Dangerous to self or others.

 (B) Unable to provide for basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health or safety….

ORS 146.133 says a person may be compelled to undergo “assisted outpatient treatment” (i.e. FORCED outpatient treatment) if the person has a “mental disorder.”  But nowhere is the term defined.

Do you have a “mental disorder” because you’ve been depressed? Anxious? Have PTSD? Or do you suffer from clinical paranoia simply because you are a gun owner?

This guy thinks so.  So does this guy.  And these folks, and these and these and these.

The people in Connecticut were called “paranoid” (a “mental disorder”) and now they are facing felony charges for owning modern rifles.

It’s important to note that all this new language does is create another class of prohibited persons and add more names to the Federal databanks.

It further stigmatizes people who may actually need and want help.

It does not provide a dime of assistance to those in need of mental health treatment.

The amendment also requires that Sheriffs and local police be informed if a prohibited person attempts to buy a gun. That is, no doubt, a reaction to our pointing out how rarely anything is actually done about people who try to buy guns when they are prohibited. And it’s fine idea if safeguards are included to protect people who are denied as a result of mistakes made by the state police, an all-too-common occurrence.

We have been informed that more amendments are coming, and there may even be a brand new bill. That bill may come from Republicans and deal only with contacting police when a prohibited person attempts a purchase.  We still believe that safeguards must be attached to any bill that does this.

It makes no sense to act on complicated legislation like this in the last hours of the session, when tempers are flaring and everyone wants to go home. But for some legislators, pride and a desire for revenge are more important than thoughtful legislation.

Please let your legislators know you oppose any 11th-hour attempts to ram through poorly crafted legislation. You can find your Oregon legislators by using the “Find My Legislators” tab on this page.  They will be the ones listed under “Senate” and “House” after you provide your address.

Thanks for keeping the heat on.

 

 

Posted on

02.28.14 GUN BILLS RE-PASSED IN HOUSE

Two gun bills that started in the Oregon House passed through the Senate yesterday and were heard again in the House today.

The reason they were back in the House was because some changes were made in the Senate, and the House had to agree to the changes. They did.

HB 4068 , which corrects errors in current law and addresses CHL applicants who had a single conviction for a small amount of marijuana, and HB 4035 which allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own firearms were both re-passed in the House.

4068 passed without a single “no” vote.

4035, the bill to protect corrections officers, got only one “no” vote. That was from House Rep Carolyn Tomei, whose single-minded hatred for gun owners has now eclipsed even Prozanski, Dembrow and Greenlick. That’s astonishing.

Representative Greenlick actually voted in favor of repassing the bill although he voted against the original passage. He spoke on the bill today, saying that it was his policy to simply vote “no” on any gun bill. (Well, any gun bill that did not call for a total ban.) So his agreement to repass the bill is quite a big deal. Remember, it was Greenlick who, last year sponsored a bill to ban virtually all modern firearms and allow warrantless searches of your home by the police. Representative Barnhart, another legislator who also defaults to “no” and had voted against this bill the first time, also changed his vote citing the addition of language that now said corrections officers would have to store their guns in lockers, if the prison provided them.  While this is far from an expression of support for gun rights, it’s good to see that they behaved with a tiny shred of common sense this time.

Make no mistake, your constant efforts were the only reason these bills passed. Many thanks to each of you who took the time to make your voice heard. It made all the difference.

That leaves us with one more piece of unfinished business. SB 1551.

This bill is a dangerous gun registration bill that has been bottled up because of your extraordinary activism.

Although its sponsor, Floyd Prozanski, promised it would pass out of his committee and even promised it would pass on the Senate floor, your actions have prevented that.

Instead he was forced to move the bill to the Rules Committee where every indication is, it will die.  But, anything can still happen. The Rules Committee (unlike other committees) does NOT close until the end of the session.  It is entirely possible that, as in years past, an effort will be made to resurrect this bill and ram it through. So don’t relax just yet.

But, so far, we have once again been victorious thanks to you. Keep your powder dry, and thanks.

Posted on

02.27.14 GUN BILLS PASS SENATE, HOUSE VOTES TO CRUSH INITIATIVE PROCESS

Two gun bills that had previously passed the Oregon House sailed through the Senate today.

HB 4068 , which corrects errors in current law and addresses CHL applicants who had a single conviction for a small amount of marijuana, and HB 4035 which  allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own firearms were both confirmed.

4035 received only one “no” vote and to no one’s surprise it came from Ginny Burdick who so hates gun owners she would rather see another corrections officer murdered than allow them to protect themselves.

4068 passed with no “no” votes.  Burdick must have misunderstood it.

These bills now head back to the House for concurrence since changes were made in the Senate.

That’s the good news. The bad news is the House passed HB 4054.

HB 4054 is not a “gun” bill, so why should you care about it?

In its passed form the bill totally subverts the ballot measure process.  After the legislature passed a bill last year to allow illegal aliens to get driver’s “cards,” signatures were gathered to place the issue before the voters. A ballot title was drafted, but the leftists in the legislature decided they didn’t like it. So instead of allowing a ballot title that accurately described what the bill in question did, (provide driving privileges to people who broke the law to be here) the ballot title will now be :

“ESTABLISHES LIMITED PURPOSE, DURATION DRIVER CARD FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO PROVE OREGON RESIDENCY, MEET DRIVING REQUIREMENTS.”

The bill forbids any judicial review of the ballot title. No matter what you think about the issue of illegal immigration, the fact is that the ballot measure process is meant specifically to be a check against the legislature. This bill removes that function and further empowers the legislature to ignore the will of the people. There is no reason to think that a legislature this arrogant would not attempt to subvert the rights of gun owners by twisting the system.  According to reports from Legislative Counsel, as referenced by some of the opponents of this bill, this has never been done before in Oregon. This is another “by any means necessary,” “Rules for Radicals” usurpation of power and it’s chilling.

While efforts are being made to turn Oregon gun owners into criminals, as has been done in New York and California and now Connecticut, real criminals are being given special rights. The proponents of this bill have said (with straight faces) that this will allow people who come here illegally to be able to “buy insurance.”  So this is going to make us all safer.  Why anyone thinks that people who break the law to be here want to obey the law to get insurance is anyone’s guess.  But gun owners have other reasons to be concerned.

This is one more step in the legitimization of people who,given the chance. vote overwhelmingly Democrat and anti-gun.  It does not take a lot of imagination to conclude that the Department of Motor Vehicles will soon  be handing voter registration cards to anyone who comes in the door, whether for a real driver’s license or a “limited purpose, duration driver card.”

Every House Democrat voted “yes” except Brent Barton. Republicans Vic Gilliam, Bob Jenson,and Greg Smith joined the Democrats and voted “aye.”

 

Posted on

02.25.14 Gun Bills Clear Senate Judiciary Committee

Two gun bills passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee today.

 House Bill 4035 , which allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own defensive firearms and HB 4068,  which corrects  mistakes in current law dealing with minor marijuana convictions, have passed out of the committee and will now go to the full Senate. They previously passed the House.

HB 4035 had a last minute amendment added to it.

Here’s what the amendment said : “SECTION 4. This 2014 Act takes effect on the 91st day after the date on which the 2014 regular session of the Seventy-seventh Legislative Assembly adjourns sine die.”

Section 3 of the bill says :“Section 2 of this 2014 Act applies to employment contracts entered into or renewed on or after the effective date of this 2014 Act.”

Without the amendment the bill would have taken effect as soon as it was signed into law.

So what does this mean for corrections officers?  We have been informed that most Oregon corrections officers are currently working without a contract. What it certainly seems to mean is that should they agree on a contract before 91 days after the current legislature adjourns then this legislation and the protections it provides would not apply until the next time they agree on a contract.

The representative of the corrections officers’ union did not object to this amendment and does not believe it will be a problem. We hope she is right, but for now it is hard to see how this can mean anything else.

Should they agree to a contract 91 days after the bill passes (assuming the Governor signs it) it appears they will be protected, but we don’t see how they can be protected if they reach an agreement before that date.

We’ve brought this to the attention of the bill’s sponsor and now we’re hoping that the people this bill was intended to help actually get the protections it affords.

We’ll be watching.

Posted on

02.21.14 PRO GUN BILLS HELD OVER AGAIN

Two good gun bills were held up again in the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday.

Citing “paperwork issues,” House Bill 4035 , which allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own defensive firearms and HB 4068,  which corrects  mistakes in current law dealing with minor marijuana convictions, have been held over until next Tuesday, the last day the committee can hear bills.We don’t know if these bills are being held up to gain leverage in passing the now stalled SB 1551, Prozanski’s gun registration expansion, but we will continue to monitor them closely.

Please consider one more message to the committee members.

Contact info and suggested message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

Please avoid any more delays in the clean passage of House Bills 4035 and 4068. These are simple, non-controversial measures that deserve your support.

Yours,

___________________________________________________

Posted on

02.19.14 Pro-Gun Bills Held Up in Senate Judiciary

Two good gun bills which passed the Oregon House were heard, but not acted on in Senate Judiciary today.
House Bill 4035 simply allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own defensive firearms but it is taking some flak from the head of the Department of Corrections who expressed concerns about “liability.”  Apparently the Department’s concerns about an issue that we know no instance of, is greater than their concerns about dead employees, who they appear to consider expendable.There were also comments made that indicated that Governor Kitzhaber opposes the bill. Of course he does. He travels everywhere surrounded by armed guards. Why should he care about the safety of a mere corrections officer?

HB 4068  cleans up mistakes in current law and allows those with old or out-of-state, minor marijuana convictions to have the same ability to apply for Oregon CHL’s as those with recent or in-state convictions.

Last minute amendments were added to this bill today. They do not appear to be a problem and may actually improve the bill.
Because of the objections to 4035 and the amendments to 4068 the bills have been held over until tomorrow.
Please contact the committee and ask them to pass the bills out with noanti-gun amendments.

Contact info and suggested message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

I am greatly concerned that HB 4035 may become the victim of a Governor and Corrections Department that seem to be more concerned with perceived “liabilities” than they are with the lives of Corrections Officers.  This is an important bill. Please pass 4035 and 4068 out of your committee and on to the Senate.

Yours,

___________________________________________________

Posted on

02.18.14 Pro-Gun Bills To Be Heard in Senate Judiciary

02.18.14
Two good gun bills which passed the Oregon House are scheduled to be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee tomorrow at 9am.
They are House Bill 4035, which simply allows corrections officers to travel to and from work with their own defensive firearms,and HB 4068 which cleans up mistakes in current law and allows those with old or out-of-state, minor marijuana convictions to have the same ability to apply for Oregon CHL’s as those with recent or in-state convictions.
Both of these bills are a step in the right direction for Oregon law.
The problem, of course, is that the committee that will hear them is chaired by Floyd Prozanski who has a history of using his position to turn every good gun bill into garbage.
Please contact the committee and ask them to pass the bills out with noanti-gun amendments.

Contact info and suggested message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

House Bills 4035 and 4068 are simple, common sense bills that enhance rights and safety. I urge your support with no anti-rights amendments.

Yours,

___________________________________________________

Posted on

02.17.14 Two Gun Bills Pass The House

02.17.14
Two gun related bills overwhelmingly passed in the Oregon House today. Both were supported and heavily amended by OFF.

HB 4035 allows correction officers to travel with privately owned firearms to and from work at prisons, something they are currently forbidden from doing.

It may seem beyond belief that men and women who work with dangerous populations are not allowed to defend themselves on their way to and from work.   Recently one of them was murdered when he stopped to help what he thought was a stranded motorist. Even civilians without permits do not have these restrictions.

It should be noted that this restriction is not Oregon law. It is a condition imposed on corrections officers by the Department of Corrections much as some school districts disarm the employees who are responsible for keeping little children safe at school.

OFF believes that no public employee should be forced to give up his rights simply because he takes a job with the state, but all too often this is the case. If HB 4035 passes the Senate and is signed into law by the governor, at least some corrections officers will not be facing this absurd liability.

There is one line in the bill that troubles us however. Section 3 of the bill states the following ; Section 2 of this 2014 Act applies to employment contracts entered into or renewed on or after the effective date of this 2014 Act.

We have not yet received a satisfactory answer for why this section is needed.

Furthermore, the CO’s must have Oregon CHL’s. This is not a requirement for civilians who travel with firearms.

The following House Reps voted against allowing CO’s to protect themselves going to and from work: Barnhart, Berger, Greenlick and Olson.

Carloyn Tomei was excused but voted against the bill in Committee. Corrections officers, please take note.

The other bill that passed out of the House today was HB 4068.

4068 is a bill OFF has been working on for some time. We heavily amended the original version and made considerable improvements.

What this bill does is apply the same standards for CHL eligibility to persons who had very old, or out-of-state convictions for small amounts of marijuana as for those with more recent or in-state convictions. This is a long overdue correction to a simple mistake in current law. There were no “no” votes on HB 4068, however, once again, Carolyn Tomei, who was not on the floor, did vote against the bill in committee.

Both these bills now move to the Senate where they may simply sail through or may be used as pawns and bargaining chips by Floyd Prozanski to push his stalled gun registration bill, SB 1551.

While this bill expands the State Police checks to private transfers, you should know that for a significant amount of time today, their phones were down again. At least one dealer reported getting an “approval” and a “delay” on his computer check of a well known customer for the same transfer!

As you know, in spite of Prozanski’s multiple assurances that the bill would get a vote on the Senate floor and pass, he lacked the votes to pass the bill out of his Senate Judiciary Committee and it was sent to the Rules Committee where it can be considered and amended well after the Judiciary Committee closes.

There have been numerous reports that the reason the bill went to the Rules Committee was because Senator Arnie Roblan (a previous supporter of a similar bill) balked and objected to passing a bill that lacked the votes on the floor.

If so, this was an attempt by some anti-gun Democrats to avoid going on the record on what may have been a failed attempt at gun registration. However, if Roblan reallywanted the bill to die he could have simply voted “no” instead of moving it to another committee where it remains alive.   Roblan’s “no” vote along with the two “no” votes from the Republican members of the committee would have killed the bill dead. Instead Roblan dodged the issue and now the bill is still alive.

There have also been reports that Prozanski will attempt to have the legislature refer the bill to the voters.  If he succeeds you can count on one thing. Millions and millions of dollars in out-of-state money will pour into Oregon to savage your rights and privacy.

You may recall in 2000, Ginny Burdick was able to pass a ban on private transfers at gun shows with the help of millions of dollars from out of state millionaires and, of course, Senator John McCain who helped them pass this travesty.  We cannot let that happen again.

Please consider another note to the members of the Rules Committee (listed below).

A sample cut and paste message follows.

Diane Rosenbaum
503-986-1700
Sen.DianeRosenbaum@state.or.us

Ted Ferriolli
503-986-1950
sen.tedferrioli@state.or.us

Lee Beyer
503-986-1706
Sen.LeeBeyer@state.or.us

Ginny Burdick
503-986-1718
sen.ginnyburdick@state.or.us

Bruce Starr
503-986-1715
Sen.BruceStarr@state.or.us

________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 1551 is now before your committee. This bill serves only as a step towards firearms confiscation.  While Senator Prozanski has claimed it would not require a background check for a loan of a firearm, your own Legislative Counsel said exactly the opposite.

While Prozanski claims to need make, model, caliber and serial number of every transferred firearm to “check for stolen guns” he can give no explanation for why those records must be kept by the transferor after the check!  Even the State Police claim they don’t do this.

The Oregon Sheriff’s Association recognizes this serves no legitimate law enforcement purpose. I urge you to pay attention to them.

Vote NO on SB 1551

____________________________________________________

This email was sent to off@oregonfirearms.org by off@oregonfirearms.org |
Oregon Firearms Federation | Box 556 | Canby | OR | 97013

 

THIS IS A TEST EMAIL ONLY.
This email was sent by the author for the sole purpose of testing a draft message. If you believe you have received the message in error, please contact the author by replying to this message. Constant Contact takes reports of abuse very seriously. If you wish to report abuse, please forward this message to abuse@constantcontact.com.