Posted on

Prozanski’s Gun Registration Bill Heard

02.06.14

Today’s hearing on SB 1551, Senator Prozanski’s gun registration expansion, was enlightening to say the least.While gun owners are often referred to as a “vocal minority,” the sign-up sheets for testimony show only 19 people in support of the bill, with 28 opposed.First to testify was Trish Whitfield from the Oregon State Police ID unit.While she did provide numbers for the total number of background checks done and the total number of denials, she did not provide any numbers for how many of those denials were for no cause.She did not provide numbers for how many denials were actually felons, as opposed to people who were denied because they were not Oregon residents and simply misunderstood laws about non-resident purchases.

But far more interesting was that she could not provide any data at all about the number of “felons” who attempted a purchase and were denied and subsequently prosecuted.

The OSP has no info and can’t share any info on this critical statistic.

But we know it is virtually never that a convicted felon attempts a transfer and is prosecuted for it.  This, of course, demonstrates what a colossal farce SB 1551 is.

Celebrity victim Mark Kelly followed the OSP.  Mark, as you know, is the former astronaut husband of Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.  Giffords was shot along with others in Arizona by Jared Lee Loughner.

Kelly and Giffords are the spokesmodels for ” Americans for Responsible Solutions” which has outraised all other “SuperPacs” with massive donations from millionaires, such as anti-gun zealot Mike Bloomberg of New York.

SB 1551 is a bill that will expand the failed background check system to virtually  all gun transfers, even to a gun you give to your father-in-law or your best friend.

But while Mark Kelly was promoting this vast new invasion of your privacy, (and calling your rights “a loophole”) he had some trouble responding to a question from Senator Betsy Close. She simply asked him if his wife’s assailant had passed a background check. Which, of course, he had.

So Kelly attempted to divert the issue by discussing a whole host of other things that this bill does not address. But the damage was done. Clearly this bill would do nothing to stop the kinds of attacks that Kelly is exploiting.

Kelly’s testimony was virtually an exact copy of the speech he recently gave in Washington state. Giffords and Kelly are on a national tour, largely funded by Bloomberg, promoting registration bills across the country.

Joining Kelly was Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber, who stated both that the bill would  not stop felons from getting guns and that we needed this bill to stop felons from getting guns!

The next panel was made up of a representative of the NRA (Dan Reid), Kevin Starrett of Oregon Firearms Federation and the irrepressible, and irreplaceable, Manny Martinez, a former Cuban citizen who escaped from Fidel Castro’s utopian workers’ paradise and came to America.

For sheer passion, few can compare with Mr. Martinez. You owe it to yourself to listen to his testimony.

Note, the hearing started with invited testimony. OFF was NOT invited. We testified as part of panel that was determined by NRA, which graciously extended an invitation to OFF and Mr. Martinez.

Dan Reid, the NRA rep, was chided by Floyd Prozanski for not being a resident of Oregon.  (Mr. Reid covers several states and lives in California.)  This was ironic of course, considering the star anti-gun celebrity witness (Mark Kelly) is from Arizona.

What followed were numerous panels of speakers from both sides of the issue.  As you would expect, the anti-rights people recounted endless horror stories about victims of “gun violence.”  (They seem totally unconcerned with people who are victims of any other kind of violence.) One woman who supported gun registration discussed how important it was for people who were suicidal to give their guns to other people. No one pointed out that under this bill that would be illegal.

But there was one uniform reality.

Not a single story involved an incident that would have been prevented if this bill was enacted. Not one.

When one firearms instructor noted (correctly) that he might well have to run a background check on anyone who took his class and used one of his guns, Senator Prozanski responded with a complete misunderstanding of an opinion from the legislature’s lawyers and said this was not true.  As usual, Floyd was 100% wrong.

But for pure comic relief, nothing could top Prozanski’s claim that he had nothing to do with informing the anti-gun side about the hearing well in advance of the public getting this information. Floyd’s ability to tell this whopper with a straight face tells you all you need to know about the man.

Floyd set the date of the hearing. He decided the time and format of the hearing.  Ceasefire Oregon had all this info almost a week before the public.  There is simply no other place they could have gotten it from.

One thing was clear: this bill is not about reducing crime. It’s not about stopping felons.  According to Sen. Prozanski, the Oregon State Police performed 263,343 background checks for firearms transfers in 2013.  He said that more than 99% were approved, and less than 1% were denied.  That would be 261,128 unnecessary background checks on law-abiding Oregonians in order to prevent less than 1% of transfers by licensed dealers at the cost of millions to law-abiding Oregonians.

Whatever the number of actual felons attempting a purchase (something we cannot know), virtually none faced any prosecution.

So what exactly are we doing here?  All the proponents agree this won’t solve the problem. It’s just a “step.”  So what’s the next “step” and what’s the goal?

There is no question they are tightening the noose. We have learned from other states that registration leads to confiscation. It’s not open to debate; it’s happening now.

Prozanski responded to this reality by suggesting it was a “conspiracy theory.”  But it’s not a “theory;” it’s a reality.

Many supporters of liberty showed up today and gave excellent testimony. We are grateful for each of you. This dangerous legislation is an attack on everyone who believes in individual rights. For everyone who showed up, whether you got a chance to testify or not, thank you.

Posted on

Prozanski Schedules Registration Bill. Gabby’s Husband Coming To Town

 

 02.04.14

Four days after he informed “Ceasefire Oregon” that he would be hearing his gun registration bill, SB 1551, Floyd Prozanski has officially scheduled the bill so the public can now see what he shared with the anti-rights extremists last Friday.

The bill will be heard on Thursday, Feb 6, at 8 AM in Hearing Room 50, which is in the Capitol basement. Floyd has invited NRA to testify. OFF was not invited; however, NRA has offered us a place on their panel.

There are still unconfirmed rumors of “celebrity” anti-gunners coming in from out of town. 


They are confirmed. Gabby Gifford’s husband, Mark Kelly, will be coming to testify in favor of gun registration.

If you are planning to come and testify, keep the following in mind:

While you may submit written testimony, you should be ready to be flexible on what you say. It is very likely that amendments will be proposed which can change the makeup of the bill.

Here are some points about the bill:

(Be prepared to respond to a moving target.)

The bill outlaws private transfers to people you have known your whole life.

The bill is a de facto registration scheme. Without registration the bill has no meaning.

There is no reason to demand the serial number of the gun being transferred if this is not a registration scheme.

In spite of what Floyd says, people HAVE had their guns confiscated IN OREGON, with NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, because of background checks.

As written, this bill allows you to give a gun to your nephew but forbids him from giving it back without police permission!

Under the bill you could give a gun to your gay partner, but you could not give a gun to person of the opposite sex with whom you lived but were not legally married to.

You could give a gun to your son-in-law, but he cannot give it back without permission from the state.

You can give a gun to your nephew but he can’t give it back without permission from the state.

If you have a range, training facility, or gun club that allows people to use guns you own, as part of a class you charge for, you have “leased” a gun and now must run a background check and transfer the gun to them before they can use the gun in the class. (Assuming the check is even completed before the class is over.)

They then must “transfer” the gun back to you at the end of the class.

The bill has no provision for allowing a transfer if the OSP can’t complete a background check.

(The law allows dealers to transfer in three days but does NOT allow private parties to transfer in 3 days if OSP can’t complete the check.)

Unlike the present system, any transfer will require that you have and retain transfer forms only available from the State Police.

If you plan to submit materials to the committee, please send a PDF to mike.reiley@state.or.us by noon tomorrow. For printed documents, please provide 10 paper copies to the assistant when you testify.

 

It’s a train wreck, folks. Let’s get out there.

Posted on

Ashland To Hear Anti-Gun Ordinances

02.02.14

 

Tomorrow,  Monday, Feb 3. the Ashland City Council will consider adopting Portland style gun restrictions.These pointless regulations are intended only to harass legitimate gun owners and will have no effect on law-breakers.

The Council meeting starts at 5.30 pm.

If you cannot be at this meeting, consider sending a message to the Ashland City Council.

A sample message follows:

_____________________________________________

 

To the Ashland City Council:

 

I strongly object to any proposed ordinance that creates or expands restrictions on law-abiding gun owners in Ashland. Not only do you risk running afoul of Oregon’s preemption statute and exposing yourself to costly litigation, but you send a message to the most law-abiding segment of our society that they should visit and spend money elsewhere.

 

I urge you not to consider any new restriction on gun owners.

Posted on

DON’T RELAX!

 

.
02.02.14

PLEASE DON’T RELAX
While many Oregonians are looking forward to the Superbowl, Floyd Prozanski and Ceasefire Oregon are working overtime to try to pass a firearms registration bill.

Make no mistake, if this bill passes they will be back for more.

In 2000, the anti-rights extremists said “gun shows” were the problem.  So they took millions in out-of-state money to pass a ban on private trades at gun shows.

Now they say the problem is a firearm you give to your best friend or father-in-law!

If they succeed in passing this you can rest assured they will be back to ban virtually all modern firearms just as they attempted in 2013 with House Bill 3200.

Ceasefire Oregon has asked anti-rights extremists to “PACK THE ROOM” on Thursday Feb. 6 when they say Prozanski will be hearing SB 1551.

There is still no official schedule showing this bill will be heard, so we can only assume Prozanski has sent advance notice to his friends while providing no information to the public.  (The new “transparency” at work.)

Ceasefire says:
“The majority of those testifying will be members of invited panels (people who have been pre-selected by the committee to speak at the hearing).”

If they are right (and apparently they are privy to info being hidden from you by Prozanski) this could well mean that Floyd is preparing a dog and pony show front loaded with anti-gunners. (Gabby Giffords?)

That’s why it’s essential that you make your voice heard loud and clear. We cannot let Floyd’s backroom deals destroy our rights.

It’s no secret that the anti-gunners will say anything and do anything do ram through their plans to disarm all of us.While Prozanski is telling people that “each month in Oregon, an average of 190 felons are denied access to guns because of background checks…” his cohort and fellow traveler, Senator Michael Dembrow, is reporting “Under the current program approximately 800 requests are denied each month..”Right, and 86% of statistics are made up on the spot.

What none of them want to talk about is the Department of Justice report that said of the 2393 people who received denials when they tried to purchase guns in 2010, a whopping 90 were arrested. That’s less than 4%!

For Senators Prozanski or Dembrow or Roblan to try to pretend this charade keeps guns away from felons is a joke.

With your help we have beaten these people back time after time. Now they are counting on a flood of cash from New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg to help them buy votes.  Your action is critical. Please consider using this link to let the legislature know where you stand.

You can contact the Senate Judiciary Committee (who will be hearing this bill) directly using the info below.

Contact info and suggested message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

I urge you to vote NO on SB 1551. This bill is a registration scheme pure and simple. It does nothing to prevent felons from getting guns but is an unwarranted invasion of my privacy.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

___________________________________________________

This email was sent to off@oregonfirearms.org by off@oregonfirearms.org |
Oregon Firearms Federation | Box 556 | Canby | OR | 97013

 

THIS IS A TEST EMAIL ONLY.
This email was sent by the author for the sole purpose of testing a draft message. If you believe you have received the message in error, please contact the author by replying to this message. Constant Contact takes reports of abuse very seriously. If you wish to report abuse, please forward this message to abuse@constantcontact.com.
Posted on

Did Floyd Schedule The Bill And Only Tell The Other Side?

   01.31.14

The anti-rights group “Ceasefire Oregon” sent out an email today saying that Prozanzki’s gun registration bill SB 1551 is scheduled for a hearing Thursday Feb. 6 at 8am.

As of now, there is no official confirmation and the bill is not scheduled on the committee calendar, so we cannot confirm this date. However, Senator Michael Dembrow, an anti-gunner who is on the committee, recently stated that he expected a hearing early in the session so this may be true.

If Ceasefire is correct then clearly Prozanski is providing them with inside information that he has not provided to the public.  Ethically questionable but not a surprise.

Oddly, Senator Alan Bates (Democrat District 3) said in a radio interview today (KMED, The Bill Meyer Show) the he did not think the bill would get out of committee. He also said he didn’t read the bill or know what was in it, so don’t put too much faith in anything he says.

We’ll keep you posted on any official confirmation, but please keep the heat on.

Contact info and suggested message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

I urge you to vote NO on SB 1551. This bill is a registration bill pure and simple. It does nothing to prevent felons from getting guns but is an unwarranted invasion of my privacy.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

___________________________________________________

Posted on

It’s Show Time!

01.29.14

First Gun Bills Scheduled.

Two gun related bills have been scheduled for hearings in the House Judiciary Committee.

The first is HB 4035. This bill allows corrections officers to have a firearm in their personal vehicles when parked in a “department parking lot.”

The bill requires that the corrections officers have CHL’s.

The bill also requires that the firearm be “locked in a gun box inside the vehicle.”

We think corrections officers should have the same rights as everyone else so we support this, but we are a bit concerned by the term “gun box” and wonder why corrections officers will be required to have CHL’s to keep a gun locked in their car when no one else does.

But clearly the intention of this bill is good and its sponsor is House Rep Jeff Barker who has been as solid a vote for gun rights as you could ever ask for.

The bill is scheduled to be heard on Monday Feb 3. at 1pm in Room 343.

The second bill is HB 4068.

This bill is scheduled to be heard on Wednesday Feb. 5 at 1pm, also in Room 343.

This bill addresses an anomaly in Oregon law.

Currently a person with a conviction for a small amount of marijuana (or a single diversion) can still apply for a CHL, but only if the conviction was in Oregon and only if it was after 1973.

This bill is intended to expand CHL eligibility to those with old or out of state convictions.

It is modeled after a bill we drafted last year that was introduced by House Rep Kim Thatcher.   While it is not as well crafted as last year’s bill and needs some fine tuning, it’s a good step and we support it.

Oddly, this bill has as a cosponsor anti-gun Floyd Prozanski.   This bears watching. Since Floyd is the main mover behind a bill to expand Oregon’s gun registration we have to wonder what his motives are in cosponsoring this bill.  Politicians love to be able to appeal to as many people as possible. Maybe Floyd is trying to get some points with gun owners while doing all he can to ram through anti-gun legislation.

Speaking of Floyd’s anti-gun legislation, Senator Michael Dembrow, who serves on Floyd’s Senate Judiciary Committee and is part of the extreme anti-gun segment of the Oregon Senate, sent out an email today expressing his support for Prozanski’s anti-gun bill and saying “Expect a long and contentious public hearing sometime early in the session.”

Dembow is no friend of gun owners, but because he is an anti-gun insider, we assume his prediction to be accurate.

Please let the members of the House Judiciary Committee know that you support House Bills 4035 and 4068.

(Please keep in mind, Committee schedules can change at any time.)

Contact info and suggested message follow:
___________________________________________________

Dear Representative,

While not perfect, House Bills HB 4035 and 4068 simply make sense. Corrections officers should have the same right to self defense as everyone else does and people with old or out-of-state convictions for small amounts of marijuana should have the same opportunities as those with in-state and more recent convictions.  I strongly urge you to support these bills.

Yours,

__________________________________________________________

Chair Jeff Barker.                    Rep.JeffBarker@state.or.us

Representative Brent Barton    Rep.BrentBarton@state.or.us

Representative Kevin Cameron  Rep.KevinCameron@state.or.us

Representative Wally Hicks       Rep.WallyHicks@state.or.us

Representative Andy Olson      Rep.AndyOlson@state.or.us

Representative Carolyn Tomei   Rep.CarolynTomei@state.or.us

Representative Jennifer Williamson   Rep.JenniferWilliamson@state.or.us

Posted on

Obey The Law, Go To Jail

01.24.14

To illustrate just how dangerous Floyd Prozanski’s gun registry bill is, we need only look to a case heard in the Supreme Court Wednesday.

The Court heard “Abramski vs United States” a case in which OFF contributed to an Amicus brief filed by other statewide gun groups and Gun Owners of America.Bruce Abramski purchased a pistol (legally with a background check)in Virginia.  He then took the pistol to Pennsylvania and transferred the pistol to his uncle, through a dealer, with a background check.As a result he was charged with making a “straw purchase” and convicted. The implications of this are breath taking.   Just imagine if they start applying this logic anytime a gun is transferred, (sold, given, traded) from its “original” purchaser.  (Some of the comments by the Justices will also trouble you.)  And this is why Prozanski’s universal registration scheme is so very dangerous.Floyd wants to extend this kind of entrapment into virtually every transfer that takes place, even if you give a gun to your best friend.But Floyd and his cronies can’t stop lying about what the bill is and what it does.

In a Statesman Journal article published today, Prozanski said:

“If the Legislature wanted to create a statewide gun registry it’s been collecting this information on dealer and gun show sales for 23 years. It’s not a registry. [The bill] extends what our current law has been since 1989; a process for background checks to be completed. All we are doing is closing a loophole.”

This does not even make sense. First he admits the state has been collecting this information for “23 years” (personal info and the make, model, caliber and serial number of the transferred gun) then he says  “It’s not a registry.”  Really? Then what IS it?

But the lies don’t stop there.  Floyd then said:

“In the 23 years that we’ve had background checks in this state, it has never led to confiscation of gun.”

The absurdity of this statement can only make you wonder if Floyd is only a liar or if he is actually delusional.  Perhaps he never heard of David Pyles.

David’s life was turned upside down, his home was invaded, and his property confiscated based on the Oregon State Police turning over information about his legal gun purchases to local police. David had broken no law, had been accused of no crime and there was no warrant for his arrest, yet he was taken into custody based on nothing more than the fact that he had purchased firearms.

The State Police broke the law when they turned over this information. Their punishment? Nothing. David’s punishment for having done nothing wrong? He lost his job and his home.

And it is this very agency that Prozanski wants to take over the job of giving you “permission” to give a gun to your uncle.

Of course, when a truly prohibited person attempts a firearm’s purchase and is denied, nothing happens to him.

According to the Statesman Journal:

“Oregon State Police spokesman Gregg Hastings said sellers aren’t told why a person was denied, and OSP doesn’t notify parole or probation officers.”

If that’s true, and we have every reason to believe it is, it makes this following quote from the same article all the more interesting:

“…but Prozanski, who works as a prosecutor in Eugene and Florence, said he is working on a case where someone is facing a parole violation for trying to buy a gun.”

Now how do you suppose anyone knew?  Given Prozanski’s history of lies, we have no way of knowing if this statement is true.

The Statesman Journal says :

“If you pass your background check, OSP destroys your information after 10 days”

But the fact is, that is only the OSP’s published policy (after the David Pyles debacle) it is not the law. The law says they can keep the info for 5 years and in a conversation we had with the retired director of the ID unit a few years ago, he could not tell us how or when records are destroyed. Is it daily? Annually?  Is there ever an audit to demonstrate that, in fact, the OSP is not keeping a very easily duplicated database?

As far as enforcement of this Prozanski said:

“We have a code of honor as citizens that you are going to follow the law,”

If he believes that, why would he think Oregonians are selling guns to felons now?

The Abramski case is very troubling and should make you very concerned about expanded background checks. The fact that the State Police ID unit will have complete control over virtually all lawful transfers is cause for concern as well.  Please take a moment to contact the members of the Judiciary Committee and express your opposition to this bill.

Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.Individual contact info and a sample message follow:Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.usSenator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.usSenator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 1551 requires that virtually all private transfers of firearms receive the approval of the State Police.  I find that to be offensive and intrusive.  Currently qualified buyers at gun dealers are waiting weeks and even months to be “approved” by the police to exercise a basic right.  I strongly oppose extending this to private transfers and gifts.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

Posted on

01.23.14 Gun Bills Officially Posted

 01.23.14

Two gun related bills were officially posted on the Oregon Legislative website today.One is the “bill” version of Floyd Prozanski’s gun registration expansion legislation which we had seen as “Legislative Concept 154”. It is now an official Senate Bill, SB 1551.As you will see, it has been introduced as a “committee bill” because Prozanski wants to attack your rights, but lacks the courage to put his name on the bill. But make no mistake, it’s his bill.  While there is little doubt he introduced it to further the agenda of Senator Ginny Burdick, he is the committee chair, he requested the bill and we are going to make sure he takes ownership of it.The other gun bill that was introduced today is HB 4068.  This bill, while far from perfect, is well intentioned.
Its purpose is to allow people who have had convictions for small amounts of marijuana in other states, or persons who had those convictions in Oregon before the law reduced the penalties for possession of  small amounts of marijuana, to apply for Oregon CHL’s.Currently persons who had convictions in Oregon and after 1973  may apply for CHL’s but persons whose convictions were from other states or who were convicted before July 22, 1973 can not.We think this bill could be improved. A bill with the same intention was introduced last session by House Rep Kim Thatcher and was somewhat better.  We’ll work to make this bill better but in any event support its intent.Floyd’s gun registration bill is still the biggest danger so we urge you to keep the pressure on to kill it. The bill will go to the Senate Judiciary Committee, so please use the contact info and suggested message below to let them know how much you oppose this dangerous legislation.You can track all gun bills here.

Thank you for your activism.

Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.

Individual contact info and a sample message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 1551 is one of the most poorly crafted pieces of legislation I have ever seen.

Under this bill an uncle can give a gun to his nephew but the nephew cannot return it without subjecting his uncle to a background check!

Under this bill I could not give a hunting rifle to my own father-in-law!

If my gun club allows someone taking a safety class to use one of our club owned guns, we’d be required to run a background check on the student and transfer the gun for the duration of the class. The student would then have to do the same to return it!  This is lunacy.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

Posted on

LET THE LIES BEGIN!

01.17.14

 

Today the Senate Judiciary Committee held a work session on LC 154. This is Floyd Prozanski’s new gun registry bill.Well maybe it’s an old gun registry bill since it is largely a copy of last year’s gun registry bill.The purpose of the “work session” was to have a vote to determine if the bill would be introduced as a “committee bill.” A “committee bill” is one where the sponsor does not want to put his name on it. So instead of the gun registry bill saying “Introduced by Floyd Prozanski” it would say “Introduced by the Senate Judiciary Committee.” Yes, of course it’s cowardly, but you know how it goes down there.

The committee is made up of three Democrats (Floyd Prozanski, Arnie Roblan, and Michael Dembrow) and two Republicans (Jeff Kruse and Betsy Close).

After Senator Jeff Kruse objected to the bill and wondered how much Michael Bloomberg’s money was pushing this, Floyd decided to “set the record straight.” As usual, that meant he was going to lie.

Now those of you who have been with us for a while know that Floyd will boldly lie any chance he gets. And here it is where it gets interesting.

Floyd, (reading from a prepared script) said that there was a lot of “misinformation” about the bill. When he says that, one thing is sure. It means there is some accurate info out there that he wants to lie about.

Floyd went on to say that this bill is NOT a “gun registration” bill, something he would never support!

So, just to be sure, we looked up “register.” Here’s what it said:

Noun:
An official list or record, for example of births, marriages, and deaths, of shipping, or of historic places.

Verb:
Enter or record on an official list or directory.

So let’s review.  Floyd Prozanski’s background check bill requires that when you give a gun to your best friend, or your cousin, or your uncle, that the State Police record the recipient’s name, address, sex, (and social security number if they choose to give it) AND the MAKE, MODEL, CALIBER and SERIAL NUMBER of the gun!

So the question is how is this NOT a registration bill?

It takes a special kind of person to lie about something so boldly. But Floyd is a special kind of person.

If history is any indication, people writing to Floyd will be told that OFF is “misinforming” people. He may throw in a few personal accusations.

Until you ask him exactly what we have “misinformed” about. And then Floyd will crawl back into his hidey-hole.

Oh, he may send out a blast email accusing OFF of “raising money” but he will NEVER tell you what we said that was “untrue.”

Because he can’t. Because he is …a liar.

It’s interesting to note that when Senator Kruse suggested that the bill might be motivated by Bloomberg money, Prozanski claimed that the bill was almost the same as last year’s and, moments later, Democrat Dembrow said the bill was very different from last year’s. Do you suppose any one of these people ever actually read them?

If they do, ask them to explain this, why can I give a gun to my nephew, but I can’t give a gun to my uncle? If I give a gun to my nephew, why is it illegal for him to give it back? (Really, that’s the bill.)

Kudos to Betsy Close and Jeff Kruse for saying NO to this nonsense. Of course they were outvoted by the Democrats, so the bill will be introduced without Floyd’s name on it, but at least Kruse and Close are on record saying they didn’t want to be associated with it.

Here’s a prediction we are happy to make. No matter what happens with this bill as it moves through the process, Prozanski will tell people we are lying about it. But he won’t say how.

Keep the pressure on folks.

Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.

Individual contact info and a sample message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

It’s been claimed that LC 154 is NOT a gun registration scheme. But clearly it is!

If the State Police collect and record the personal information of the recipient of the firearm AND the make, model, caliber and serial number of the gun, that IS a gun registry, period.

We have seen how these policies lead to confiscations as they have in New York and now California.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

Posted on

Five Years In Prison For Giving a Gun to Your Best Friend

01.15.14

We now have the draft of Floyd Prozanski’s promised anti-rights bill.This bill is intended to expand the failed background check system to guns you give to your best friend, your great-grandson or even your cousin!Punishment for doing this without “permission” from the State Police (who routinely delay and deny without justification) can get you a possible 5 years in the slammer and a fine of $125,000.00!

And these people call us “extremists.”

The proponents of this nonsense like to brag about how many people were denied gun purchases through dealers and offer this as “proof” that the system is “working.”  Nowhere do they address all the people who are denied without justification. Nowhere do they address that when real prohibited persons are “denied” they simply leave the store and buy or steal guns elsewhere.

Nowhere do they address that this bill will do nothing to change that. They don’t address that it is nearly unenforceable except against good people who may accidentally run afoul of this absurd mandate.

Nowhere do they address the reality that the State Police have shut down background checks altogether when their “systems were down,” meaning that no transfers could take place, or the fact that all transfers could be ended by simply closing down the background check system for as long as the State Police or the politicians want.

Make no mistake, this is the bill the anti-gun militants and Michael Bloomberg want to create the list they need for confiscation. Don’t believe it? Look at the news from New York where lists of guns have been used to confiscate them from the very people whoOBEYED the law!

We must stop this now.

Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.

Individual contact info and a sample message follow:

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us

Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us

Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us

Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

The current background check system for gun purchases is a total failure. Qualified buyers are often delayed and denied. I strongly urge you to reject any expansion of this failed system to private transfers.

We have seen how these policies lead to confiscations as they have in New York and now California.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

Posted on

More on Portland Slime Moving South

 

01.13.14On December 27th we warned you about a petition that was being circulated in Ashland encouraging Portland-style (and probably illegal) anti-gun ordinances.We have now been reliably informed that the Ashland City Council plans to actually consider some of these new restrictions.While right now the City Council website has no listing, we have been told to expect preliminary hearings on these restrictions on Feb 3. We do not yet have a time for the meetings; however, you can keep an eye on things at the Council’s website.

We have been told that at least one council member, Carol Voisin, has expressed support for these new attacks on the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

Whether you live in the Ashland area or not, it would be wise to let the Council know you oppose these measures. Let them know that no matter where you live, you are free to spend your money elsewhere, and that by enacting rules that violate state law, they are opening themselves up to costly litigation.

A contact link for the Council and a suggested cut and paste message follow.

 

Ashland City Council email page.

_____________________________________

To the Ashland City Council:

 

I strongly object to any proposed ordinance that creates or expands restrictions on law-abiding gun owners in Ashland.Not only do you risk running afoul of Oregon’s preemption statute and exposing yourself to costly litigation, but you send a message to the most law-abiding segment of our society that they should visit and spend money elsewhere.

I urge you not to consider any new restriction on gun owners.

___________________________________________________________________

You might also consider a letter to the editor:

Mail Tribune & Daily Tidings
P.O. Box 1108
111 N. Fir St.
Medford, OR 97501
bhunter@mailtribune.com

 

Posted on

FIRST GUN CONTROL BILL OF 2014 SCHEDULED

01.07.14

The Senate Judiciary Committee will be introducing its first gun control bill on January 17, at 3:30 PM in Hearing Room F at the Capitol.This is the bill we told you was coming banning private transfers and starting the registration process. The draft of the bill is number LC 154 and is not yet available for the public to see. But we have it.

The legislature is not scheduled to start proceedings until February so they are getting out in front in their efforts to attack your rights.

As you know, all gun registration starts with “background checks” and no doubt this bill will extend the failed background checks to virtually all transfers.  So if you want to give a gun to your oldest friend or your nephew, you will now need to ask the State Police for “permission.”If the system is down you are out of luck.These background checks are how the state builds a list of gun owners. These lists have been used over and over  to begin the confiscation process, not only in Nazi Germany but in New York and now in California.

It’s imperative that you contact the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and tell them in no uncertain terms that you oppose extending the failed background check system to a private transfer and you oppose any new gun registrations.

(Update 01.09.14 We have asked why the Democrats are insisting on bringing back a bill they lacked the votes to pass last year. One possible answer is this video of Republican Senator Bruce Starr. It is troubling, however soon after someone posted it on our Facebook page Starr responded with a comment “I will not be supporting any new gun laws in Oregon.”   We expect him to honor that pledge.)Below is a list of members of the committee with contact info and a suggested cut and paste message:

______________________________________________

Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties

Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704   District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us


Senator Betsy Close

Republican – District 8 – Albany

Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us

Senator Michael Dembrow

Democrat – District 23 – Portland

Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723    District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us
Senator Jeff Kruse

Republican – District 1 – Roseburg

Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701   District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us


Senator Arnie Roblan

Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay

Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

___________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

The current background check system for gun purchases is a total failure. Qualified buyers are often delayed and denied. I strongly urge you to reject any expansion of this failed system to private transfers.

We have seen how these policies lead to confiscations as they have in New York and now California.

Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.

Yours,

 

 

_______________________________________________________________
Like us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter

Posted on

Portland Slime Seeps South

12.27.13

As many of you know, there is an effort underway to impose, in the City of Ashland, the kind of pointless (and largely illegal) anti-gun ordinances that Portland and now Multnomah County have in place.

A group calling itself “Citizens for a Safe Ashland” has concluded that the city is such a hotbed of “gun violence” that it must impose restrictions “in the hopes of adding Ashland to the list of cities with sensible controls on firearms.”  The have started a petition drive to push their agenda.

The proposed ordinance would mirror Portland’s ban on open loaded carry for those without CHL’s and copy the lock-up regulations now in place in Portland and Multnomah County. It would also regulate the possession of feeding devices like magazines and allow “peace officers” to “inspect” firearms, “clips” and magazines. Under the proposed rule, you could not have a loaded handgun in your car, carried openly, without a CHL. In fact, no one without a permit from the Sheriff could openly carry a firearm in any “public place.”

We believe that portions of the proposed ordinance are clearly illegal. Part of the ordinance parrots Portland’s rule and says :

“A person commits the offense of endangering a child if a person fails to prevent access to a loaded or unloaded firearm by a minor without the permission of the person, a parent or guardian, when the person knew or reasonably should have known that a minor could gain access to the firearm.”

However Oregon’s pre-emption statute clearly says “Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly.”

While Oregon’s laws allow a city to regulate some loaded carry in public places it’s very doubtful that the storage parts of this ordinance are legal.

It’s important to note that Portland and Mutnomah County  (which promoters of this petition are copying) also have a regulation that further victimizes you if someone steals a firearm you own. If you fail to report a firearm stolen you are subject to a fine of $2500.00 and failure to report a stolen gun’s serial number will subject you to a fine of $200.00 per stolen gun!

Recently OFF was contacted by a person who had 2 rifles stolen in the  crime free utopia of Portland. When he could not provide the stolen guns’ serial numbers he received a letter from the City of Portland demanding payment  of a $400.00 fine.  In November our lawyers agreed to represent him and contacted the City informing them that the fine was unlawful and would not be paid. Our intention was to immediately take them to court when they attempted to collect. We have not heard a word since then.

We believe that  if a person who has standing is willing to fight these ordinances we have a good chance of winning, and at least so far Portland has shown no interest in taking us on. However, we believe it is essential that the disease of illegal gun restrictions not be allowed to continue to spread. Please contact the Ashland City Council and let them know that it would be a foolish mistake to replicate the failed policies of Portland and Multnomah County. Remind them that the Sheriff of Multnomah County , Dan Staton, supported similar rules in his county only to promise later not to enforce them!

You can send an email to the entire City Council using this link. The Council’s other contact info is:

20 East Main St
Ashland, Oregon 97520
Phone: (541) 488-6002

Remember, even if you don’t live in Ashland, you have the discretion to spend your vacation dollars elsewhere and the City Council should be reminded of that.

Posted on

Santa Claus Is Coming to Town. So Is Michael Bloomberg.

12.19.13
In addition to death and taxes, there is one more thing you can count on, attempts at new gun restrictions, and now, a billionaire to help push a liberty smashing agenda.

This February, the Oregon Legislature will have its “even year” short session.

Annual sessions were sold to Oregonians as a way to deal with the budget, which our legislature simply could not handle when they met every two years. But they never restricted the new, even-year sessions to just budget issues, so now anything is game in a compressed session where things are raced through and no one reads the bills.

Furious that they were defeated in the last full session, Senate Democrats have vowed to bring gun control back in 2014. And this time they’ll have a boatload of money from soon-to-be “ex” New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg.

Not satisfied to have turned New York into both a police and a nanny state, Bloomberg has vowed to use his billions to spread his anti-rights policies from coast to coast, and Oregon is officially in his sights.

His organization “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” is infamous for having members who are criminals  and for using taxpayer money to promote Bloomberg’s Nazi-style gun laws.

MAIG even listed one of the Boston Bombers as a “victim of gun violence!

And now Bloomberg is heading our way.  The Senate Democrats have promised to re-introduce “universal background checks” and guaranteed a floor vote this time.

What “universal background checks” are is the next step towards universal gun registration and the eventual confiscation of those registered guns, just as is happening now in New York.  It’s also a mandate that every firearms transfer require the “permission” of the civilian staffers at the Oregon State Police ID unit, the same staffers who routinely deny or delay legitimate transfers, lie to dealers and buyers about the law in an effort to intimidate people, and disclose private information in direct violation of Oregon statute!

If Bloomberg has his way, the delays and bureaucratic bungling, now so common with transfers from dealers, will apply to a gun you want to give to your nephew or best friend!

And that’s just the beginning. These very same “background check” records will be the foundation for the list of guns to be banned and confiscated “New York” style. If you think that’s an exaggeration, remember, last session anti-gun Oregon legislators introduced legislation to ban virtually all modern firearms and allow warrantless searches of your home!

We have no doubts there will be many other anti-gun bills coming in February as well, and Bloomberg has already got his hired guns lined up to push them.

Bloomberg has hired lobbyists Len Bergstein and Seth Prickett to help eliminate your gun rights. (Their other “clients” include Clearview MRI, Zoomcare and Oregon Restaurant Services.)  They will have no shortage of money to make media buys and grease anti-gun politicians.

There are only a few explanations for why the Senate Democrats are promising the floor vote they refused to have last session. Since the Senate has the same number of anti-gunners as it did this past session, they must either believe it would be good to vote even if they lose ( this is the less likely possibility)  or they believe they have “flipped” the one vote they were short last session.

While it would be easy to assume that the one vote is Betsy Johnson, the only pro-gun Democrat in the Senate, we cannot take for granted that it’s not a wavering Republican and nothing has happened that would lead anyone to believe that Johnson has been pressured enough to sell out, she is a gun owner herself.

No matter what, we have to be ready.

It’s essential that you and I are prepared to move to counter their certain attacks. We cannot let an out-of-state billionaire extort our rights from us.

You can support our efforts and save on your tax bill by making a donation to our Political Action Committee. For all of you who already have, we thank you.

If you want to take advantage of the PAC tax credit, which means your donation could cost you nothing, please note we need to receive your donation before the end of the year.

You can make a safe donation online here. Be sure to use the drop down menu to designate your contribution to the PAC so you are assured of the tax credit.

If you prefer you may send a check to OFFPAC at Box 556, Canby OR 97013 but we must receive your donation before 12.31.13, so don’t wait.

We are going to have quite a battle in February, but with your help we will win again.

Thanks, and Merry Christmas.

Posted on

11.27.13 Short Time Left To Comment On NFA Rules Change Proposal

As you know, the Obama administration is attempting to formulate rules to harass owners of machine guns, short barreled rifles and shotguns and suppressors.

The new rule would require that Trusts, LLC’s and corporate transfers of these items obtain the permission of the chief law enforcement officer of a jurisdiction, usually a sheriff.

There is still time to comment on the proposed rule change and so far there have not been many. But this is important. The ATF changes its mind and its rules with no warning and no reason. See the following links:

*    http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/01/25/shoestring-machine-gun/
*    http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/the-chore-boy-menace#slide=1
*    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/2/gun-makers-baffled-by-atf-criteria/

Furthermore ATF “reclassifications” can occur with political pressure:

*    The retroactive destructive device ruling for Striker 12 family shotguns:
◦    http://www.atf.gov/regulations-rulings/rulings/atf-rulings/atf-ruling-2001-1.html 
*    The shotgun “importability” study to attempt to ban some shotgun imports:
◦    http://www.atf.gov/files/firearms/industry/january-2011-importability-of-certain-shotguns.pdf

There is no telling how these new rules will be applied.

Currently OFF is a participant in a US Supreme Court case that demonstrates how dangerous and arbitrary ATF can be. Abramski vs United States is a case where a person purchased a handgun after completing a background check and transferred the gun to his uncle, who also completed a background check. Yet Abramski was convicted of a “straw purchase” when it was claimed he “lied” on the 4473 about whether he was the “real” buyer of the gun.  This in spite of the fact that there is no other option on the form. If this stands, ATF will have once again made up their own law, and one could argue that no one could lawfully transfer any gun they purchased from a dealer.

Giving more power to the these lawbreakers would be a big mistake. And there is no question that these proposed changes would do nothing to stop crime, as is the case with all gun control laws.

Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before December 9, 2013

You can make comments on the proposed rule change here:

http://tiny.cc/qj7a5w     This takes you to the regulations.gov page to comment on the proposed rule.

Suggested comments:
———————————————————
I oppose the ATF proposal to require CLEO sign off approval for all title II firearm transfers, including Trusts and other legal entities.

1.    ATF admits in the proposal that it has access to several databases, including NICS, which could be used to accomplish what the petitioner requested and ensure that firearms do not fall into the wrong hands.
2.    The CLEO sign off is clumsy and outdated.  It is also far more expensive for the industry, firearms owners and the government to maintain – or expand in this proposal, than to use the NICS check procedures to verify transfers of title II firearms are not transferred to prohibited persons.
3.    The CLEO sign off enables corrupt persons in CLEO positions to politically coerce money out of transferees in the guise of campaign donations.
A NICS check on an individual, principle officers of a trust or other legal entity would be faster, more efficient, and would reduce the chances for human error.  This would allow the NFA transfer process to be streamlined, it would be safer for the public and would be a less burdensome regulatory change.

Once again, I oppose any expansion of the ‘Chief Law Enforcement Officer’ sign off requirements for NFA transfers.

___________________________________________________________________

Like us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter