|
Category: OFF Alerts
Prozanski Schedules Registration Bill. Gabby’s Husband Coming To Town
|
02.04.14 Four days after he informed “Ceasefire Oregon” that he would be hearing his gun registration bill, SB 1551, Floyd Prozanski has officially scheduled the bill so the public can now see what he shared with the anti-rights extremists last Friday. The bill will be heard on Thursday, Feb 6, at 8 AM in Hearing Room 50, which is in the Capitol basement. Floyd has invited NRA to testify. OFF was not invited; however, NRA has offered us a place on their panel.
If you are planning to come and testify, keep the following in mind: While you may submit written testimony, you should be ready to be flexible on what you say. It is very likely that amendments will be proposed which can change the makeup of the bill. Here are some points about the bill: (Be prepared to respond to a moving target.) The bill outlaws private transfers to people you have known your whole life. The bill is a de facto registration scheme. Without registration the bill has no meaning. There is no reason to demand the serial number of the gun being transferred if this is not a registration scheme. In spite of what Floyd says, people HAVE had their guns confiscated IN OREGON, with NO LEGAL JUSTIFICATION, because of background checks. As written, this bill allows you to give a gun to your nephew but forbids him from giving it back without police permission! Under the bill you could give a gun to your gay partner, but you could not give a gun to person of the opposite sex with whom you lived but were not legally married to. You could give a gun to your son-in-law, but he cannot give it back without permission from the state. You can give a gun to your nephew but he can’t give it back without permission from the state. If you have a range, training facility, or gun club that allows people to use guns you own, as part of a class you charge for, you have “leased” a gun and now must run a background check and transfer the gun to them before they can use the gun in the class. (Assuming the check is even completed before the class is over.) They then must “transfer” the gun back to you at the end of the class. The bill has no provision for allowing a transfer if the OSP can’t complete a background check. (The law allows dealers to transfer in three days but does NOT allow private parties to transfer in 3 days if OSP can’t complete the check.) Unlike the present system, any transfer will require that you have and retain transfer forms only available from the State Police. If you plan to submit materials to the committee, please send a PDF to mike.reiley@state.or.us by noon tomorrow. For printed documents, please provide 10 paper copies to the assistant when you testify.
It’s a train wreck, folks. Let’s get out there. |
Ashland To Hear Anti-Gun Ordinances
| 02.02.14
Tomorrow, Monday, Feb 3. the Ashland City Council will consider adopting Portland style gun restrictions.These pointless regulations are intended only to harass legitimate gun owners and will have no effect on law-breakers. The Council meeting starts at 5.30 pm. If you cannot be at this meeting, consider sending a message to the Ashland City Council. A sample message follows: _____________________________________________
To the Ashland City Council:
I strongly object to any proposed ordinance that creates or expands restrictions on law-abiding gun owners in Ashland. Not only do you risk running afoul of Oregon’s preemption statute and exposing yourself to costly litigation, but you send a message to the most law-abiding segment of our society that they should visit and spend money elsewhere.
I urge you not to consider any new restriction on gun owners. |
DON’T RELAX!
|
Oregon Firearms Federation | Box 556 | Canby | OR | 97013
|
This email was sent by the author for the sole purpose of testing a draft message. If you believe you have received the message in error, please contact the author by replying to this message. Constant Contact takes reports of abuse very seriously. If you wish to report abuse, please forward this message to abuse@constantcontact.com.
Did Floyd Schedule The Bill And Only Tell The Other Side?
|
It’s Show Time!
01.29.14
Two gun related bills have been scheduled for hearings in the House Judiciary Committee.
The bill also requires that the firearm be “locked in a gun box inside the vehicle.”
We think corrections officers should have the same rights as everyone else so we support this, but we are a bit concerned by the term “gun box” and wonder why corrections officers will be required to have CHL’s to keep a gun locked in their car when no one else does.
But clearly the intention of this bill is good and its sponsor is House Rep Jeff Barker who has been as solid a vote for gun rights as you could ever ask for.
The bill is scheduled to be heard on Monday Feb 3. at 1pm in Room 343.
The second bill is HB 4068.
This bill is scheduled to be heard on Wednesday Feb. 5 at 1pm, also in Room 343.
This bill addresses an anomaly in Oregon law.
Currently a person with a conviction for a small amount of marijuana (or a single diversion) can still apply for a CHL, but only if the conviction was in Oregon and only if it was after 1973.
This bill is intended to expand CHL eligibility to those with old or out of state convictions.
It is modeled after a bill we drafted last year that was introduced by House Rep Kim Thatcher. While it is not as well crafted as last year’s bill and needs some fine tuning, it’s a good step and we support it.
Oddly, this bill has as a cosponsor anti-gun Floyd Prozanski. This bears watching. Since Floyd is the main mover behind a bill to expand Oregon’s gun registration we have to wonder what his motives are in cosponsoring this bill. Politicians love to be able to appeal to as many people as possible. Maybe Floyd is trying to get some points with gun owners while doing all he can to ram through anti-gun legislation.
Speaking of Floyd’s anti-gun legislation, Senator Michael Dembrow, who serves on Floyd’s Senate Judiciary Committee and is part of the extreme anti-gun segment of the Oregon Senate, sent out an email today expressing his support for Prozanski’s anti-gun bill and saying “Expect a long and contentious public hearing sometime early in the session.”
Dembow is no friend of gun owners, but because he is an anti-gun insider, we assume his prediction to be accurate.
Please let the members of the House Judiciary Committee know that you support House Bills 4035 and 4068.
(Please keep in mind, Committee schedules can change at any time.)
Contact info and suggested message follow:
___________________________________________________
Dear Representative,
While not perfect, House Bills HB 4035 and 4068 simply make sense. Corrections officers should have the same right to self defense as everyone else does and people with old or out-of-state convictions for small amounts of marijuana should have the same opportunities as those with in-state and more recent convictions. I strongly urge you to support these bills.
Yours,
__________________________________________________________
Chair Jeff Barker. Rep.JeffBarker@state.or.us
Representative Brent Barton Rep.BrentBarton@state.or.us
Representative Kevin Cameron Rep.KevinCameron@state.or.us
Representative Wally Hicks Rep.WallyHicks@state.or.us
Representative Andy Olson Rep.AndyOlson@state.or.us
Representative Carolyn Tomei Rep.CarolynTomei@state.or.us
Representative Jennifer Williamson Rep.JenniferWilliamson@state.or.us
Obey The Law, Go To Jail
01.24.14
To illustrate just how dangerous Floyd Prozanski’s gun registry bill is, we need only look to a case heard in the Supreme Court Wednesday.
In a Statesman Journal article published today, Prozanski said:
“If the Legislature wanted to create a statewide gun registry it’s been collecting this information on dealer and gun show sales for 23 years. It’s not a registry. [The bill] extends what our current law has been since 1989; a process for background checks to be completed. All we are doing is closing a loophole.”
This does not even make sense. First he admits the state has been collecting this information for “23 years” (personal info and the make, model, caliber and serial number of the transferred gun) then he says “It’s not a registry.” Really? Then what IS it?
But the lies don’t stop there. Floyd then said:
“In the 23 years that we’ve had background checks in this state, it has never led to confiscation of gun.”
The absurdity of this statement can only make you wonder if Floyd is only a liar or if he is actually delusional. Perhaps he never heard of David Pyles.
David’s life was turned upside down, his home was invaded, and his property confiscated based on the Oregon State Police turning over information about his legal gun purchases to local police. David had broken no law, had been accused of no crime and there was no warrant for his arrest, yet he was taken into custody based on nothing more than the fact that he had purchased firearms.
The State Police broke the law when they turned over this information. Their punishment? Nothing. David’s punishment for having done nothing wrong? He lost his job and his home.
And it is this very agency that Prozanski wants to take over the job of giving you “permission” to give a gun to your uncle.
Of course, when a truly prohibited person attempts a firearm’s purchase and is denied, nothing happens to him.
According to the Statesman Journal:
“Oregon State Police spokesman Gregg Hastings said sellers aren’t told why a person was denied, and OSP doesn’t notify parole or probation officers.”
If that’s true, and we have every reason to believe it is, it makes this following quote from the same article all the more interesting:
“…but Prozanski, who works as a prosecutor in Eugene and Florence, said he is working on a case where someone is facing a parole violation for trying to buy a gun.”
Now how do you suppose anyone knew? Given Prozanski’s history of lies, we have no way of knowing if this statement is true.
The Statesman Journal says :
“If you pass your background check, OSP destroys your information after 10 days”
But the fact is, that is only the OSP’s published policy (after the David Pyles debacle) it is not the law. The law says they can keep the info for 5 years and in a conversation we had with the retired director of the ID unit a few years ago, he could not tell us how or when records are destroyed. Is it daily? Annually? Is there ever an audit to demonstrate that, in fact, the OSP is not keeping a very easily duplicated database?
As far as enforcement of this Prozanski said:
“We have a code of honor as citizens that you are going to follow the law,”
If he believes that, why would he think Oregonians are selling guns to felons now?
The Abramski case is very troubling and should make you very concerned about expanded background checks. The fact that the State Police ID unit will have complete control over virtually all lawful transfers is cause for concern as well. Please take a moment to contact the members of the Judiciary Committee and express your opposition to this bill.
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704 District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.usSenator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.usSenator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723 District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us
Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701 District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us
Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us
___________________________________________________________________
Dear Senator,
SB 1551 requires that virtually all private transfers of firearms receive the approval of the State Police. I find that to be offensive and intrusive. Currently qualified buyers at gun dealers are waiting weeks and even months to be “approved” by the police to exercise a basic right. I strongly oppose extending this to private transfers and gifts.
Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.
Yours,
01.23.14 Gun Bills Officially Posted
|
|
Thank you for your activism.
Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.
Individual contact info and a sample message follow:
Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704 District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us
Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us
Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723 District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us
Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701 District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us
Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us
___________________________________________________________________
Dear Senator,
SB 1551 is one of the most poorly crafted pieces of legislation I have ever seen.
Under this bill an uncle can give a gun to his nephew but the nephew cannot return it without subjecting his uncle to a background check!
Under this bill I could not give a hunting rifle to my own father-in-law!
If my gun club allows someone taking a safety class to use one of our club owned guns, we’d be required to run a background check on the student and transfer the gun for the duration of the class. The student would then have to do the same to return it! This is lunacy.
Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.
Yours,
LET THE LIES BEGIN!
01.17.14
The committee is made up of three Democrats (Floyd Prozanski, Arnie Roblan, and Michael Dembrow) and two Republicans (Jeff Kruse and Betsy Close).
After Senator Jeff Kruse objected to the bill and wondered how much Michael Bloomberg’s money was pushing this, Floyd decided to “set the record straight.” As usual, that meant he was going to lie.
Now those of you who have been with us for a while know that Floyd will boldly lie any chance he gets. And here it is where it gets interesting.
Floyd, (reading from a prepared script) said that there was a lot of “misinformation” about the bill. When he says that, one thing is sure. It means there is some accurate info out there that he wants to lie about.
Floyd went on to say that this bill is NOT a “gun registration” bill, something he would never support!
So, just to be sure, we looked up “register.” Here’s what it said:
Noun:
An official list or record, for example of births, marriages, and deaths, of shipping, or of historic places.
Verb:
Enter or record on an official list or directory.
So let’s review. Floyd Prozanski’s background check bill requires that when you give a gun to your best friend, or your cousin, or your uncle, that the State Police record the recipient’s name, address, sex, (and social security number if they choose to give it) AND the MAKE, MODEL, CALIBER and SERIAL NUMBER of the gun!
So the question is how is this NOT a registration bill?
It takes a special kind of person to lie about something so boldly. But Floyd is a special kind of person.
If history is any indication, people writing to Floyd will be told that OFF is “misinforming” people. He may throw in a few personal accusations.
Until you ask him exactly what we have “misinformed” about. And then Floyd will crawl back into his hidey-hole.
Oh, he may send out a blast email accusing OFF of “raising money” but he will NEVER tell you what we said that was “untrue.”
Because he can’t. Because he is …a liar.
It’s interesting to note that when Senator Kruse suggested that the bill might be motivated by Bloomberg money, Prozanski claimed that the bill was almost the same as last year’s and, moments later, Democrat Dembrow said the bill was very different from last year’s. Do you suppose any one of these people ever actually read them?
If they do, ask them to explain this, why can I give a gun to my nephew, but I can’t give a gun to my uncle? If I give a gun to my nephew, why is it illegal for him to give it back? (Really, that’s the bill.)
Kudos to Betsy Close and Jeff Kruse for saying NO to this nonsense. Of course they were outvoted by the Democrats, so the bill will be introduced without Floyd’s name on it, but at least Kruse and Close are on record saying they didn’t want to be associated with it.
Here’s a prediction we are happy to make. No matter what happens with this bill as it moves through the process, Prozanski will tell people we are lying about it. But he won’t say how.
Keep the pressure on folks.
Contact info for the entire Senate Judiciary Committee is here.
Individual contact info and a sample message follow:
Senator Floyd Prozanski
Democrat – District 4 – South Lane and North Douglas Counties
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1704 District Phone: 541-342-2447
Email: Sen.FloydProzanski@state.or.us
Senator Betsy Close
Republican – District 8 – Albany
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1708
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-303, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyClose@state.or.us
Senator Michael Dembrow
Democrat – District 23 – Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1723 District Phone: 503-281-0608
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-407, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.MichaelDembrow@state.or.us
Senator Jeff Kruse
Republican – District 1 – Roseburg
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1701 District Phone: 541-580-3276
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-315, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.JeffKruse@state.or.us
Senator Arnie Roblan
Democrat – District 5 – Coos Bay
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1705
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-417, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us
___________________________________________________________________
Dear Senator,
It’s been claimed that LC 154 is NOT a gun registration scheme. But clearly it is!
If the State Police collect and record the personal information of the recipient of the firearm AND the make, model, caliber and serial number of the gun, that IS a gun registry, period.
We have seen how these policies lead to confiscations as they have in New York and now California.
Vote against any restrictions on private transfers.
Yours,
Five Years In Prison For Giving a Gun to Your Best Friend
|
More on Portland Slime Moving South
|
FIRST GUN CONTROL BILL OF 2014 SCHEDULED
01.07.14
|
Portland Slime Seeps South
12.27.13
As many of you know, there is an effort underway to impose, in the City of Ashland, the kind of pointless (and largely illegal) anti-gun ordinances that Portland and now Multnomah County have in place.
A group calling itself “Citizens for a Safe Ashland” has concluded that the city is such a hotbed of “gun violence” that it must impose restrictions “in the hopes of adding Ashland to the list of cities with sensible controls on firearms.” The have started a petition drive to push their agenda.
The proposed ordinance would mirror Portland’s ban on open loaded carry for those without CHL’s and copy the lock-up regulations now in place in Portland and Multnomah County. It would also regulate the possession of feeding devices like magazines and allow “peace officers” to “inspect” firearms, “clips” and magazines. Under the proposed rule, you could not have a loaded handgun in your car, carried openly, without a CHL. In fact, no one without a permit from the Sheriff could openly carry a firearm in any “public place.”
We believe that portions of the proposed ordinance are clearly illegal. Part of the ordinance parrots Portland’s rule and says :
“A person commits the offense of endangering a child if a person fails to prevent access to a loaded or unloaded firearm by a minor without the permission of the person, a parent or guardian, when the person knew or reasonably should have known that a minor could gain access to the firearm.”
However Oregon’s pre-emption statute clearly says “Except as expressly authorized by state statute, the authority to regulate in any matter whatsoever the sale, acquisition, transfer, ownership, possession, storage, transportation or use of firearms or any element relating to firearms and components thereof, including ammunition, is vested solely in the Legislative Assembly.”
While Oregon’s laws allow a city to regulate some loaded carry in public places it’s very doubtful that the storage parts of this ordinance are legal.
It’s important to note that Portland and Mutnomah County (which promoters of this petition are copying) also have a regulation that further victimizes you if someone steals a firearm you own. If you fail to report a firearm stolen you are subject to a fine of $2500.00 and failure to report a stolen gun’s serial number will subject you to a fine of $200.00 per stolen gun!
Recently OFF was contacted by a person who had 2 rifles stolen in the crime free utopia of Portland. When he could not provide the stolen guns’ serial numbers he received a letter from the City of Portland demanding payment of a $400.00 fine. In November our lawyers agreed to represent him and contacted the City informing them that the fine was unlawful and would not be paid. Our intention was to immediately take them to court when they attempted to collect. We have not heard a word since then.
We believe that if a person who has standing is willing to fight these ordinances we have a good chance of winning, and at least so far Portland has shown no interest in taking us on. However, we believe it is essential that the disease of illegal gun restrictions not be allowed to continue to spread. Please contact the Ashland City Council and let them know that it would be a foolish mistake to replicate the failed policies of Portland and Multnomah County. Remind them that the Sheriff of Multnomah County , Dan Staton, supported similar rules in his county only to promise later not to enforce them!
You can send an email to the entire City Council using this link. The Council’s other contact info is:
20 East Main St
Ashland, Oregon 97520
Phone: (541) 488-6002
Remember, even if you don’t live in Ashland, you have the discretion to spend your vacation dollars elsewhere and the City Council should be reminded of that.
Santa Claus Is Coming to Town. So Is Michael Bloomberg.
12.19.13
In addition to death and taxes, there is one more thing you can count on, attempts at new gun restrictions, and now, a billionaire to help push a liberty smashing agenda.
This February, the Oregon Legislature will have its “even year” short session.
Annual sessions were sold to Oregonians as a way to deal with the budget, which our legislature simply could not handle when they met every two years. But they never restricted the new, even-year sessions to just budget issues, so now anything is game in a compressed session where things are raced through and no one reads the bills.
Furious that they were defeated in the last full session, Senate Democrats have vowed to bring gun control back in 2014. And this time they’ll have a boatload of money from soon-to-be “ex” New York Mayor, Michael Bloomberg.
Not satisfied to have turned New York into both a police and a nanny state, Bloomberg has vowed to use his billions to spread his anti-rights policies from coast to coast, and Oregon is officially in his sights.
His organization “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” is infamous for having members who are criminals and for using taxpayer money to promote Bloomberg’s Nazi-style gun laws.
MAIG even listed one of the Boston Bombers as a “victim of gun violence!”
And now Bloomberg is heading our way. The Senate Democrats have promised to re-introduce “universal background checks” and guaranteed a floor vote this time.
What “universal background checks” are is the next step towards universal gun registration and the eventual confiscation of those registered guns, just as is happening now in New York. It’s also a mandate that every firearms transfer require the “permission” of the civilian staffers at the Oregon State Police ID unit, the same staffers who routinely deny or delay legitimate transfers, lie to dealers and buyers about the law in an effort to intimidate people, and disclose private information in direct violation of Oregon statute!
If Bloomberg has his way, the delays and bureaucratic bungling, now so common with transfers from dealers, will apply to a gun you want to give to your nephew or best friend!
And that’s just the beginning. These very same “background check” records will be the foundation for the list of guns to be banned and confiscated “New York” style. If you think that’s an exaggeration, remember, last session anti-gun Oregon legislators introduced legislation to ban virtually all modern firearms and allow warrantless searches of your home!
We have no doubts there will be many other anti-gun bills coming in February as well, and Bloomberg has already got his hired guns lined up to push them.
Bloomberg has hired lobbyists Len Bergstein and Seth Prickett to help eliminate your gun rights. (Their other “clients” include Clearview MRI, Zoomcare and Oregon Restaurant Services.) They will have no shortage of money to make media buys and grease anti-gun politicians.
There are only a few explanations for why the Senate Democrats are promising the floor vote they refused to have last session. Since the Senate has the same number of anti-gunners as it did this past session, they must either believe it would be good to vote even if they lose ( this is the less likely possibility) or they believe they have “flipped” the one vote they were short last session.
While it would be easy to assume that the one vote is Betsy Johnson, the only pro-gun Democrat in the Senate, we cannot take for granted that it’s not a wavering Republican and nothing has happened that would lead anyone to believe that Johnson has been pressured enough to sell out, she is a gun owner herself.
No matter what, we have to be ready.
It’s essential that you and I are prepared to move to counter their certain attacks. We cannot let an out-of-state billionaire extort our rights from us.
You can support our efforts and save on your tax bill by making a donation to our Political Action Committee. For all of you who already have, we thank you.
If you want to take advantage of the PAC tax credit, which means your donation could cost you nothing, please note we need to receive your donation before the end of the year.
You can make a safe donation online here. Be sure to use the drop down menu to designate your contribution to the PAC so you are assured of the tax credit.
If you prefer you may send a check to OFFPAC at Box 556, Canby OR 97013 but we must receive your donation before 12.31.13, so don’t wait.
We are going to have quite a battle in February, but with your help we will win again.
Thanks, and Merry Christmas.
11.27.13 Short Time Left To Comment On NFA Rules Change Proposal
As you know, the Obama administration is attempting to formulate rules to harass owners of machine guns, short barreled rifles and shotguns and suppressors.
The new rule would require that Trusts, LLC’s and corporate transfers of these items obtain the permission of the chief law enforcement officer of a jurisdiction, usually a sheriff.
There is still time to comment on the proposed rule change and so far there have not been many. But this is important. The ATF changes its mind and its rules with no warning and no reason. See the following links:
* http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/01/25/shoestring-machine-gun/
* http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/the-chore-boy-menace#slide=1
* http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/2/gun-makers-baffled-by-atf-criteria/
Furthermore ATF “reclassifications” can occur with political pressure:
* The retroactive destructive device ruling for Striker 12 family shotguns:
◦ http://www.atf.gov/regulations-rulings/rulings/atf-rulings/atf-ruling-2001-1.html
* The shotgun “importability” study to attempt to ban some shotgun imports:
◦ http://www.atf.gov/files/firearms/industry/january-2011-importability-of-certain-shotguns.pdf
There is no telling how these new rules will be applied.
Currently OFF is a participant in a US Supreme Court case that demonstrates how dangerous and arbitrary ATF can be. Abramski vs United States is a case where a person purchased a handgun after completing a background check and transferred the gun to his uncle, who also completed a background check. Yet Abramski was convicted of a “straw purchase” when it was claimed he “lied” on the 4473 about whether he was the “real” buyer of the gun. This in spite of the fact that there is no other option on the form. If this stands, ATF will have once again made up their own law, and one could argue that no one could lawfully transfer any gun they purchased from a dealer.
Giving more power to the these lawbreakers would be a big mistake. And there is no question that these proposed changes would do nothing to stop crime, as is the case with all gun control laws.
Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before December 9, 2013
You can make comments on the proposed rule change here:
http://tiny.cc/qj7a5w This takes you to the regulations.gov page to comment on the proposed rule.
Suggested comments:
———————————————————
I oppose the ATF proposal to require CLEO sign off approval for all title II firearm transfers, including Trusts and other legal entities.
1. ATF admits in the proposal that it has access to several databases, including NICS, which could be used to accomplish what the petitioner requested and ensure that firearms do not fall into the wrong hands.
2. The CLEO sign off is clumsy and outdated. It is also far more expensive for the industry, firearms owners and the government to maintain – or expand in this proposal, than to use the NICS check procedures to verify transfers of title II firearms are not transferred to prohibited persons.
3. The CLEO sign off enables corrupt persons in CLEO positions to politically coerce money out of transferees in the guise of campaign donations.
A NICS check on an individual, principle officers of a trust or other legal entity would be faster, more efficient, and would reduce the chances for human error. This would allow the NFA transfer process to be streamlined, it would be safer for the public and would be a less burdensome regulatory change.
Once again, I oppose any expansion of the ‘Chief Law Enforcement Officer’ sign off requirements for NFA transfers.
___________________________________________________________________


