Posted on

2013 Session Ends. All Anti-Gun Bills Are Dead.

The 2013 Legislative Session has ended. I can recall no session where the efforts to strip you of your liberties were more intense.

Immediately in the wake of the Clackamas Town Center shootings and the Newtown Connecticut massacre, the anti-rights vultures swooped in wasting not one minute to exploit the deaths of the victims.

While every session brings the usual collection of anti-gun bills, this time the issue was on fire across the country. The media attention was extraordinary. Nationally, the pressure to ban firearms was at fever pitch, and in some states, gun owners saw their rights evaporate during late-night, backdoor deals designed to eliminate the input of the voters.

New York’s attacks were the most craven and obscene, but gun owners also got slammed in California, Colorado, Connecticut, and Delaware among others.

Yet here in Oregon, where our Governor is anti-gun, our Senate President is anti-gun, our Speaker of the House is anti-gun and both chambers are controlled by an anti-gun party, you managed to defeat every single assault on our rights!

Do not underestimate how remarkable that accomplishment is. And make no mistake, your activism is all that stood between us and a total loss of our gun rights.

I want to give you a wrap-up of what took place in Salem in 2013 and there will be more on that later, but first, I need to ask for you help.
Frankly, I’d never seen anything like this session.  As you know, if you’ve been with us for a while, Oregon Firearms has typically done one “renewal” mailing per year. Usually in December, we’d ask folks to renew their commitment to fighting for gun rights. Frankly, that mailing was usually responsible for providing a significant portion of our operating expenses for the year.  Then came Clackamas and Newtown and all hell broke loose.

The media descended and the phones simply did not stop ringing. Gun owners across the state were joining by the score and we had to add staff just to keep up.

Coincidentally, a long planned and extensive update of our website was being put into effect. (Yes, that was a little nerve-wracking! ) We were building our online auto-mailer to help you communicate with legislators. We were coping with aging servers and other hardware that needed to be replaced but had to be put off until the session ended to ensure that our ability to communicate with you was not interrupted. But we did it.

Now we have some catching up to do. Many of you have been very generous in your support even when we were doing no fundraising. For that, we are deeply grateful. But now I am going to ask you to make whatever contribution you can afford to help us offset the unusually high expenses we’ve incurred.  First though, I want to tell you what we’ve done and will do to make OFF the best activist group in the state.

As I’ve already mentioned, we have completely redesigned our website to make it easier to use and more informative.  We’ve created an automailing device that has contributed to virtually shutting down the legislative email system in protest of anti-gun bills. (And I can tell you, it was very effective.)

We’ve increased the number of volunteers working gun shows and other events so you can meet with us face to face. We’ve improved our use of social media and soon we’ll be upgrading our servers and other equipment so we can make sure you are always kept informed and served well, as OFF supporters. But as you know, all this does not come cheap. So I am hoping I can count on you to make the most generous contribution you can to keep us in this battle.

Your donation of $100.00, $50.00 or even $35.00 will mean a lot now as we prepare for the inevitable attacks that will come next year. We are going to be ready, but of course, we can’t do it without your help.

OFF members are the most dedicated and well informed gun owners in the state and quite possibly the entire country. But we were only able to achieve what we have because of your support. So please consider whatever you can afford to help us keep fighting.

Now, on to events in Salem.

So much went on this session that it will be hard to cover even the “highlights.”

Immediately after the Clackamas Town Center shooting, Ginny Burdick unveiled her ban on standard ammo magazines. The truth was that the bill had been drafted long before the shooting, but Burdick (to no one’s surprise) lost no time in exploiting the victims of that shooting to promote her agenda. This is nothing new. Burdick has been dragging this bill around for years.

But next came a stunner. With the help of Burdick and 13 other politicians, House Rep. Mitch Greenlick introduced HB3200.  This notorious atrocity banned virtually all modern firearms and magazines. Those in possession faced 10 years in prison and a quarter million dollar fine for each “violation.” But wait, there was more. The bill called for warrantless searches of your home by the police!   Think about it. The people who claim to only want “commonsense” gun laws would put most gun owners in prison for the rest of their lives and order the police to search their homes, Nazi-style with no warrant!  These are the people who call us “extremists.”  The cat was clearly out of the bag. There is no longer any pretense about their goals. Of course, this bill was quickly promoted by “Ceasefire Oregon” who insist they “don’t want to take anyone’s guns away.”  HB 3200 has proven forever what liars our opponents are.

No doubt it was bills like this that put over 3000 gun owners on the Capitol Steps in January. But your response was swift and decisive.  The reaction to 3200 soon had sponsors scurrying for cover.  Even as “Ceasefire Oregon” was encouraging its (few) supporters to lobby for the bill, politicians like Senator Mark Hass were calling our office to say they had removed their name from the bill. (Too late Mark. You should have read it.)

When it became clear that your activism had killed 3200, the Democrats in the Senate, led by Floyd Prozanski, cobbled together 4 anti-gun bills from the many introduced in hopes of passing them.

The bills would:

  • Ban defensive firearms on school property, (a policy that has proven to be a tragic and deadly failure time after time.)
  • Ban firearms in “public buildings” if the firearm was visible.
  • Outlaw private transfers of firearms.
  • Restrict available firearms training for CHL’s

    It’s important to note, that as bad as these bills were, they were far worse in their original forms. Rest assured it was the pressure from all those who called, wrote and showed up at the hearings that got them watered down to the still-bad versions that were voted on in committee.

 

Prior to the bills getting this far, we had spoken to Senator Arnie Roblan who assured us he was not interested in any bills that accomplished nothing but were done for purely political purposes.  In the past, as a House Rep, Roblan had sometimes been supportive of gun rights. Now as a newly elected Senator, he turned his back on gun owners and voted for every single one of these bills in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Roblan’s betrayal greatly simplified the candidate rating process. In those few moments of duplicity, Roblan earned himself an “F” from OFF.

 

Although all four anti-gun bills passed out of committee on a party line vote, your relentless pressure forced the bills into the Rules Committee because there simply were not enough votes on the Senate floor to pass them. The Rules Committee is where bills go to die, or be kept on life support until enough arms can be twisted to get them passed on the floor. Because of you, the arm twisting just didn’t work.

 

The entire Republican caucus refused to approve the bills. That meant that if only one Democrat refused to go along, the bills were dead. That one Democrat was Senator Betsy Johnson who said from the start she would be a “no”.  With the vote count at 15-15 the bills did not have the 16 votes needed to pass and they died in the Rules Committee.

 

When it became clear that the bills were dead, there was some last minute maneuvering by Senators from both parties that threatened to bring some kind of “background check” bill back to life. We considered this snatching defeat from the jaws of victory and let the players know that it would be a terrible idea to open up this can of worms again. Eventually those misguided ideas were dropped.

 

Meanwhile, while anti-gun bills were being blocked by your efforts in the Oregon Legislature, Multnomah County pushed through some new anti-gun regulations that mirrored Portland’s failed and laughable policies.  While the ordinances were being debated, Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Staton showed up to voice his support claiming they were great tools to help him fight gun crime.  Soon after, at a meeting in a rural part of the county, Staton did a remarkable reversal and promised not to enforce the regulations!  Earlier, Staton had published a letter expressing his support for Second Amendment Rights.  Clearly the Sheriff is confused.

Now a lawsuit by several Multnomah County residents against the proposals is being initiated. Like Portland’s rules, the ordinances are horribly drafted and largely unenforceable.  Stay tuned on this one.

Attacks on your rights are clearly center stage now. From the Feds right down to the county level, the efforts to strip you of your liberties are on the front burner for every tinhorn bureaucrat and politician.

Sadly, in many places these efforts have been successful, but even when they have been, the forces of resistance have not been passive.  From open defiance in New York,to Sheriffs suing in Colorado, the pro-rights movement is active and engaged and willing to fight.

In Oregon, once again, that spirit has prevailed.  In the face of overwhelming odds we beat them back one more time. In spite of the vicious attacks and lies, in spite of the frauds perpetrated by the likes of Burdick and fellow travelers, in spite of every effort to turn the best of us into criminals by legislative fiat, we won.

While we are always the first to let you know who is attacking you and what you should do about it, it’s important to remember the friends we have in the Oregon Legislature. Without a doubt, once again, the most ardent supporter of gun rights was House Rep Kim Thatcher.  While we have many strong supporters like Senators Larry George and Brian Boquist among others, Kim , once again, stood out as a true hero to liberty. She and her staff have been invaluable to our cause.

So now I ask you to take a moment to congratulate yourself. I want to thank every single person who called, wrote, testified or showed up at the rallies. This victory belongs to you. And while we really cannot rest as long as the Burdicks, and the Greenlicks and the Obamas are in office, as long as the threat comes from as close as your county commissioner or as far away as a faceless UN functionary, for right here and now, OFF members and supporters have proven we won’t compromise, we won’t back down and we won’t be defeated.

 

For you, I am truly grateful.

 

Kevin Starrett

Posted on

Senator Betsy Johnson Follow-Up

06.10.13
Many Oregonians have received an email from State Senator Betsy Johnson in response to notes they had sent her concerned about what her current position is on gun rights.

We have received countless copies of her response, which we have copied below.  We want to thank everyone who forwarded it and who took time to contact her.

First of all, we want to note that we contacted Senator Johnson’s office before we sent out our last alert expressing concern about her position. We have still received no response from her, although many of you have.

In Senator Johnson’s email she says “it’s just an early conversation, but it is a bi-partisan effort to close some loopholes in Oregon’s gun background check system.”

To date we have seen no definition of what “loopholes” she wants to close even though we know people have asked her. We are not familiar with any “loopholes.” If anything the background check system already denies rights to too many people who should not be prevented from purchasing firearms.

Her email response also says “Senator Johnson says 2nd amendment rights are being respected, and she believes there needs to have a way (sic) to have folks who have been adjudicated as mentally ill to be added to the gun registry, so that person would not be able to own a gun.”

We don’t know what she means by “the gun registry” although we would like to, but we do need to point out that several years ago Oregon agreed to comply with national legislation promoted by both the Brady Campaign and the NRA that did, in fact, share those records with the Feds and NICS. So we can’t quite understand why we have to do it again.

Senator Johnson’s previous support for gun rights has made all the difference in fights we’ve had in the past. But as of yet, we have received no response to our call to her to clarify where she stands now. If you have, please share it with us.

If you want to contact Senator Johnson for more info she can be reached at 503 986 1716 or by email at sen.betsyjohnson@state.or.us

Also please be aware that there is lots of action still taking place to promote and pass gun laws. Some coming from unexpected places. So do NOT assume this issue is over.

Senator Johnson’s Email:
___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your email.

I have not changed my position on any of the gun bills being proposed; should they come to the floor of the Senate, I will still be a no.

With respect to what has been posted elsewhere, here is exactly what was reported in my facebook post:

“May 31

Budgets, background checks public safety on ‘This Week with State Senator Betsy Johnson’. Senator Johnson says legislators are busily working on budgets and some legislators are also talking about reasonable gun background check legislation. Senator Johnson says she has nothing specific to share about any potential legislation, it’s just an early conversation, but it is a bi-partisan effort to close some loopholes in Oregon’s gun background check system. Senator Johnson says 2nd amendment rights are being respected, and she believes there needs to have a way to have folks who have been adjudicated as mentally ill to be added to the gun registry, so that person would not be able to own a gun. Senator Johnson says nothing on the gun issue has dramatically changed, other than some Democrats and Republicans are sitting down together — she says gun safety awareness courses are part of this preliminary conversation. 4 previous gun bills are gone and won’t be heard. Senator Johnson says those four bills will not be the basis of any conversation about gun laws going on now. She says there is no specific legislation being discussed at this point, and right now, it’s just talking.”

As you can see, my comments have to do with better reporting of adjudicated mental conditions to NICS (an area that Oregon has a dismal track record on), and promote (NOT MANDATE!) gun safety courses (think a Hunter’s Safety Course).

During this entire “gun” discussion, these are two areas that have most often been mentioned by pro 2A constituents. For the Oregonian, OFF or others to somehow “extrapolate” more into what I have said would be, well, I’ll let you decide.

In any event, I am sorry that recent reports have caused you concern. I have not, and will not, be changing my position on the proposed bills.

And, I have nothing to do with the New York folks.

I hope this clarifies the issue a bit. If I can offer any additional information, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

Betsy

(503) 986-1716

 

Posted on

Betsy Johnson Now Talking Gun Control

06.04.13

 

Senator Betsy Johnson, who until now has been a solid “no” on new gun restrictions, appears to be changing her mind.

After a stint away from the Capitol due to a car accident, she has said she is open to a “reasonable background check bill.”

NY billionaire Michael Bloomberg just dropped over a million dollars in Nevada to ram through this kind of new attack on gun rights. And we know he’s planning to spend heavily here in Oregon.

We found it strange that the anti-gun bills were being held up, and some were saying the Democrats were waiting until Johnson got out of the hospital, but since she has been adamant about voting “no” that made no sense.  Now maybe it does.

Clearly Senator Johnson is feeling incredible heat from her caucus and the money sure to come into Oregon from Bloomberg is not going to help us either.

In Nevada, Justin Jones, a Democratic State Senator who sponsored Bloomberg’s anti-gun bill there, was quoted as saying he hoped Bloomberg would stay involved in Nevada politics. “It never hurts to have friends with money,” he said.

And trust us, this fight is going to be all about money and Bloomberg has an unlimited supply to impose his totalitarian plans.

Johnson, we have been told, is part of the appointed “work group” on gun control. Based on her past assurance that she would stand up for gun rights, this is very bad news indeed.

Please contact Senator Johnson and ask her to stick by her promises to protect Oregonians’ gun rights. No amount of money from an out-of-state billionaire should be able to buy our liberty.

Contact info and sample message follow.

Senator Betsy Johnson
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1716
District Phone: 503-543-4046
900 Court St NE, S-209, Salem, OR, 97301
Email: Sen.BetsyJohnson@state.or.us
Website: http://www.leg.state.or.us/johnson

____________________________________________________________________

Dear Senator Johnson,

After your courageous stand defending my gun rights, I was very disappointed to hear you are considering supporting an expansion of the failed background check system here in Oregon.

You may know that Michael Bloomberg just spent over million dollars to ram though a similar bill in Nevada.

As an Oregonian, I am deeply offended that a billionaire is trying to buy my freedom.  I strongly urge you to reject his hypocritical agenda.

Remember, when Bloomberg travels to his mansion in Bermuda, he takes armed NY cops with him even though even the Bermuda Police don’t have guns.

Bloomberg’s cynical, deceitful agenda must not be allowed to control our legislature.

Sincerely,

__________________________________________________________________________________

http://www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2013/06/why_oregon_gun_bill_isnt_dead.html
_________________________________________________

Posted on

GUN BILLS NOT DEAD

06.03.13

Many of you may have received an email from NRA last week warning  of the possible revival of SB 700.

SB 700 is the expansion on background checks that would require you to ask the police for permission to give a rifle to your nephew.

Since that alert was sent, we have received reliable confirmations from Capitol insiders that this is, in fact, very credible.

We have been told that an effort will be made to amend the bill and rush it to the Senate floor.   We do not know what amendments are being suggested or what has changed that makes Senate President Peter Courtney think the bill now has a chance to pass.  Anything may have happened.

Last session Courtney revived an anti-gun bill that was dead and raced it to the Senate floor with no public hearings. He may well attempt this kind of dirty trick again.

A deal may have been made, a bribe offered, or perhaps Courtney just wants a vote, win or lose, to use against the Republicans.

If this happens of course, we would also have a recorded vote to use against anti-gun Senators, but there is no question that the best outcome would be for that bill, and the other three anti-gun bills that are now in the Senate Rules Committee to simply die.

Anything can happen now and happen fast. And don’t forget, we fully expect Bloomberg to drop in some NYC arm twisters with millions of dollars.

It would be wise to send one more email to your Senator urging him to vote against new gun rights restrictions.

You can use this link to be connected to your Senator:

http://www.legislatorpro.com/(tqzaarqoi5y3h3jfgpnsafid)/oregon/writelegis.aspx

Or you can use our automailer to reach them all:

http://automailer.oregonfirearms.org/

Posted on

Don’t Relax Just Yet

05.21.13

Although all news stories have indicated that the privacy (and rights) busting anti-gun bills are dead in the Rules Committee, reports of their demise are premature.

Not satisfied with crippling Second Amendment rights in his own state (and dictating what you can eat and drink) New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is mounting a well funded assault on your gun rights.

A political consultant hired by Bloomberg has sent out a collection of anti-gun editorials to legislators, and Republicans in Oregon are starting to fear Bloomberg’s limitless bankroll.

Meredith Shield, the Director of Governmental Affairs for Oregon Operations for “Strategies 360″
(240 N. Broadway Ste 118 Portland, OR 97227 T  503-595-1998 F  503-546-9725 C  971-221-3201) appears to be the new point person attempting to revive whatever assaults on your liberties she and Bloomberg can.

In an email sent out today, she said :

“As you likely known (sic) , President Courtney has tasked a Senate work group with crafting a bipartisan agreement on establishing universal criminal background checks for gun sales. We will keep you updated on the outcome of these negotiations as soon as they are available. In the meantime, we wanted to share with you this attached packet of media clips showing that people across Oregon continuing (sic) to call for legislative action this session to help reduce gun violence in our communities.  We are always available to answer any additional questions you may have on this issue.”

While the Senate Republicans have, so far, remained united in opposing new regulations and restrictions on your gun rights, Senator Bruce Starr is now considering legislation that would not only expand the mandate that you ask the state for permission to obtain a gun, it would increase the fees you would have to pay for that “privilege.”

Now more than ever we need to remind all senators that expanded background checks mean nothing more than expanded harassment of gun owners. The fact is, the background check system does not work now. People are routinely delayed, often for months, with no justification. The  last thing we need is to make this failed system bigger.

Senator Starr has a history of voting pro-gun. It would appear he has become the target of the tiny, but noisy, anti-gun fringe who have virtually no members but do have the backing of  billionaire Bloomberg. Please contact Senator Starr and remind him that he has never had the support of the anti-rights zealots and is not likely to get it by pandering to this small group of extremists.

You can use the link below and modify the message if you choose.

Senator Bruce Starr

Posted on

GUN BILLS IN TROUBLE BUT NOT DEAD

GUN BILLS SENT TO RULES COMMITTEE

We have been reliably informed that the four anti-gun bills, along with SB 713, which would have expanded the places gun ranges could be operated, have been referred to the Senate Rules Committee.

While it would be premature to assume that this means the bills are dead, it’s quite likely.

But make no assumptions. Senate President Peter Courtney is still looking for a way to revive at least some of these bills and anti-rights radicals like Ginny Burdick are working overtime to see that that happens.

“The best outcome for the NRA and other extremists is for the bills not to go to the floor so that their supporters can continue to hide on this issue,” said Burdick, referring to the National Rifle Association.”

Make no mistake. The battle is far from over. But clearly all your efforts are paying off. Please don’t stop now.

Posted on

GUN BILL STATUS

05.05.13

For some time rumors have been flying around concerning the 4 anti-gun bills that passed out of the Senate Judiciary committee on a party line vote.

 

Senate Bills 347, 699, 700 and 796 would normally move to the Senate floor for a vote. Now, what will happen to them is anyone’s guess. We have been reliably informed that many Democrats do not want to vote on these bills, especially Democrats facing re-election. But a handful of the most zealous liberty-haters like Burdick, Prozanski and Monnes-Anderson see it as an chance to force Republicans to go on the record. The zealots hope to use that vote (which they think they will lose) against Republicans in future elections.

 

This is a strategy that cuts both ways, and some Democrats know it. At this point, it seems likely that the anti-gunners will lose a vote on the floor, but we’ll still have a recorded vote to use against them, so it may well be that there are members of both parties who would like to avoid a recorded vote.

 

As we have learned from the many incorrect rumors, we simply cannot say what will happen with these bills. Ginny Burdick is pushing for a vote, but Senate President Peter Courtney may well want these bills to be shuffled off to some other committee to die. Still, we have seen Courtney cave to Burdick’s will in the past. So we must be vigilant. This is no time to back off on the pressure.

 

On Wednesday May 8, the Senate Rules Committee will be hearing a bill that should be important to everyone.

 

While not a “gun bill,” SB 596 is  a step in the right direction for fixing some of the serious problems we have in the process of moving bills through our legislature.

 

What SB 596 does is require that when amendments are offered to bills, the legislator who is requesting the amendments must be named.

 

Currently, amendments are drafted and considered by committees and the requestors may remain anonymous.

 

This is one of many flaws in the legislative process. Amendments are often not available to the public until very late in the game. Bills are introduced as “committee bills” so the public does not know who authored them. In many cases, bills receive public testimony (often from people who have traveled great distances to be heard) then, after public testimony is closed, those same bills are completely rewritten and the public has no opportunity to express their opinions on the final bill even though it looks nothing like the bill they testified on.

 

All of these issues can be addressed by the House and Senate themselves if they choose to, but SB 596 is a good start.  The bill was requested by pro-gun Senator Alan Olsen.  Please consider sending a note of support to the Rules Committee.


Diane Rosenbaum, Chair

Ted Ferrioli, Vice-Chair

Lee Beyer

Ginny Burdick

Bruce Starr

If the above links don’t work (some internet providers cannot support these links) please send the following cut and paste message to the members of the committee.

 

Diane Rosenbaum, Chair
Ted Ferrioli, Vice-Chair
Lee Beyer
Ginny Burdick
Bruce Starr

_________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 596 is a long overdue step in the right direction to make our legislative process more transparent and friendly to the public.
While we still have a long way to go (for example, I believe the public should be able to testify on a bill after it’s been heavily amended) this bill would be a positive move forward.
Please pass this bill out of your committee.

Sincerely,

Posted on

MULTNOMAH COUNTY PASSES ANTI-GUN ORDINANCES

04.25.13

Today, the Multnomah County Commissioners unanimously passed an ordinance to demonize gun owners while having no effect on criminals or the violently mentally ill.

Although the County website often removes or changes URLs, the most recent one containing the ordinance can be seen here.

While there will be more on this in coming days, including reports from OFF members who attended the hearing, here is the summary:

Open loaded carry will now be illegal in Multnomah County for non-licensees.

Only security guards who work at banks will be allowed to be armed. Armed guards elsewhere would be prohibited   (Apparently much of the “gun violence” is being committed by security guards.)

It will now be unlawful for a person without a CHL to have a loaded magazine or speed loader in any public place, including your car, anywhere in the county.

It will now be unlawful to refuse to allow the police to inspect a magazine you have…even if you don’t have a gun!

It will now be a crime to allow a minor to have access to one of your firearms, unless of course, you’ve given him permission to have it. (We know, it makes no sense.)

This won’t apply if the minor was on your property illegally.  This won’t apply if your gun had a trigger lock.  The County has not explained how they will prove your firearm did NOT have a trigger lock.  We are confident that all guns that are obtained by minors from this point on, will be reported to have had trigger locks.  (It would appear that none of the County Commissioners are Mensa candidates.)

If your firearm is stolen and you don’t report the theft within 48 hours of “knowing or having reason to know” that it was stolen, you face a $2,500.00 fine.  We predict there will be lots of people who didn’t “know” their guns were stolen.

If your gun is stolen and you can’t provide a serial number, you will be charged a $200.00 “administrative fee.”  They don’t say what that fee is supposed to cover.

All in all, pointless rules that are only intended to harass and demonize gun owners. The Sheriff of Multnomah County thinks these rules are a great idea. (The County has no rules punishing people who allow minors access to their car keys.)

Reports are that the overwhelming majority of people who testified were in opposition.

More info to follow.

On another note, Ceasefire Oregon is encouraging its few supporters to lean on Senator Betsy Johnson to support gun control even though she has repeatedly  stated in writing she will not. As you may know, Senator Johnson is hospitalized following a car accident.  The gun bills passed by the Senate Judiciary Committee have not yet been scheduled for a floor vote and some are saying it’s because Senator Johnson is not available.  But this makes sense ONLY it the Democrats in control are convinced that with enough time they can change her vote.  If she’s not available, her absence is the same as a “no” vote.  Now is no time to let up. Please continue to contact the legislators and urge them to vote “NO” on all gun control bills.

http://automailer.oregonfirearms.org/

Posted on

Reminder On Anti-Gun Ordinances in Multnomah County

The Multnomah County Commissioners are planning to pass an anti-gun ordinance this Thursday at 9:30 AM.

(Our alert from yesterday mistakenly said this vote was scheduled for “next week”.)

While we have been told there will be an opportunity for public testimony, the schedule indicates there will be “invited” testimony.

Ceasefire Oregon has been “invited”.  No pro-gun groups or individuals are listed among the “invited.”

The Commission’s website describes their actions  this way:

“In the aftermath of mass shootings in Clackamas Town Center and Newtown, Conn., Multnomah County’s Board of Commissioners moved forward on an ordinance Thursday to address illegal gun use in the county.”

In fact the proposed ordinance does not “address illegal gun use” at all. Instead it makes perfectly normal activities like open carry illegal.

The agenda can be seen here.

Contact info for the County Commissioners can be found here.

If you want to attend the hearing and attempt to have your voice heard it will be at 501 S.E. Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 600  Portland, OR 97214

More info about the proposed ordinance can be seen here.

Posted on

Redefining Hypocrisy

04.22.13

Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Staton recently testified before the Multnomah County Commissioners endorsing their latest proposals to strip Multnomah County residents of gun rights.

Their proposals (due to be enacted next week Thursday) would not only make it illegal for most people to be armed in public places, it would also make many victims of gun thefts… criminals. So, not only would they be victims of a crime, they would become criminals because they were victims of crime.

Rational people will recognize this as lunacy. But clearly Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Staton has not. In fact, he has embraced these proposals.

In the political climate in which we live, this should be disappointing, but not surprising. But it is a bit surprising in light of a letter Staton sent in January to the people who elected him.

In it, Staton said :

“The first line of my Oath of Office is that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and I have and intend to continue to do that very thing. I support the rights of citizens granted by the Constitution, and have worked hard to ensure those rights are protected.”

And yet now, Staton has hitched his wagon to the star of disarming the people who hired him. Well that didn’t take long did it?

If you want to share your concerns with the Sheriff his email is sheriff@mcso.us and his phone is 503-988-4300 .

Posted on

Multnomah County Moves Forward On Anti-Gun Ordinances

04.19.13

Yesterday, the Multnomah County Commissioners moved forward on anti-gun ordinances in a largely staged and theatrical hearing.The video of the hearing is available on this page.

They had several panels of anti-gun, anti-freedom speakers who regurgitated the worn cliches we have come to expect from people who prefer platitudes to solutions. We heard the usual message that while these changes would do little, if they saved “just one life” they would be worth the erosion of liberty they would cause.

The beauty of the “just one life” canard is that you never have to actually prove that it did any such thing.  The usual array of anti-rights fanatics were joined by family members of the Clackamas Town Center shooting.  While you cannot help but sympathize with anyone who has lost a family member, you cannot ignore that nothing being proposed here would have made a difference. One victim’s family member admitted as much but urged the County to adopt these pointless measures anyway.  The urge to “do something” even when that “something” does nothing is quite strong.

We expect the normal line-up of freedom haters to trot out their tired and disproved rhetoric. We even expect them to be invited and be given special treatment by the deceitful political hacks who push this nonsense. But what was truly disturbing was seeing Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Staton come out in support of this pointless, symbolic posturing.

While other Oregon Sheriffs are making bold stands in defense of the people of their counties, Staton came and testified in favor of these useless attacks on liberty.

The proposed ordinances (which will probably be formally adopted on April 25) start by listing biased and unsubstantiated opinions as fact.

“About one-third of U.S. households contain a gun, and half of gun-owning households don’t lockup their guns, including 40 percent of households with children under age 18.”

The ordinance calls for an end to Oregon’s pre-emeption law so that our state can once again become a patchwork of confusing and contradictory regulations putting all lawful gun owners at risk.

The ordinance will outlaw “loaded carry in public places” for all non CHL holders. That includes armed security guards who don’t work for banks. It will make it illegal for non-license holders in rural parts of the county to be safely armed.

It will make it illegal for non-license holders to have a loaded magazine! That means if you have a handgun locked in your trunk and a loaded magazine in your locked glove box, you are a criminal.

It will force you to allow a police officer to inspect a magazine in your possession even if you don’t have a gun!

It will require you to lock up your firearms to prevent a minor from getting them. It does not require you to lock up your car keys, your chain saw or your kitchen knives. It does not require you to secure household chemicals.

It will fine you $2500.00 if your firearm is stolen and you don’t report it, with serial numbers, within 48 hours of “knowing, or having reason to know it was stolen or cannot be located through reasonable effort.”  Really? Are you serious?  OK,  so, we draft another meaningless attack on victims of crime but we let them off if they just say “I didn’t know.”  Is this a reasonable use of tax-payer dollars?  Is this going to stop the criminals and madmen? Are we electing imbeciles?

The ordinance can be seen here, although the County changes this URL often so it might disappear.

Sheriff Dan Staton can be reached at (503) 988 – 4300.

Posted on

ANTI-GUN BILLS MOVE OUT OF COMMITTEE

04.18.13

Four anti-rights bills moved out of the Senate Judiciary Committee today.

Senator Arnie Roblan who had told us he saw little need for three of these bills voted for all four. Roblan was the swing vote and he caved to the pressure of the Senate Democrats and agreed to attack your liberties.

The bills that passed, with 3 Democrats voting yes and both Republicans (Jeff Kruse and Betsy Close ) voting no, were SB 347, 699,700 and 796.

SB 347 as amended will make you a criminal if you are a CHL holder and you take your daughter to a soccer game at a school.

SB 699 as amended would make you a criminal if a firearm you were carrying in a “public building” could be seen. As bad as that is, what’s worse is that this bill redefines what a “public building” is. While currently that term is pretty limited, this bill would expand it to “any other building owned or occupied by a public body as defined in ORS 174.109”. As  NRA lobbyist Roger Beyer pointed out, in some small towns this could be a private home! For example, a small water district might have its office in the private residence of a member of that board.  If you pulled into his driveway with a rifle in your pickup, you would become a felon! Apparently Arnie Roblan was informed of this and voted for it anyway.

SB 700 as amended will make it illegal to give a gun to your nephew or your best friend without permission from the failed State Police ID Unit . It will require that you acquire and use state issued forms and keep records of your transfer for 5 years. It allows the State Police to delay a transfer… forever.
It provides no relief if the delay is unwarranted.

SB 796 as amended will make it illegal for you to to use 21st century technology to get firearms instruction for a CHL.

This bills now all move to the full Senate for a vote. They can still be defeated if all Senate Republicans vote no and one Senate Democrat votes no.

Since it is now clear that Roblan is going to roll over and vote for these attacks, that means the only Senate Democrat who could vote no is Betsy Johnson.

She has repeatedly written that she will vote no and her staff assured us today she is solidly against all four bills. But it never hurts to encourage her.

If your Senator is a Republican or is Betsy Johnson, a short note of opposition to these bills is in order.

You can use this link to send an email to your Senator even if you do not know who he is. Be sure to only check the “State Senate” box.

Posted on

Moving “Closer and Closer” to Gun Control Bills

04.17.13

Senator Arnie Roblan is reportedly moving “closer and closer” to supporting some or all of the anti-gun bill currently in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

These bills, SB 347, 699, 700 and 796 have, once again, been held over and now are due to be voted on tomorrow, the last day they can move forward without a suspension of the rules.

Although heavily amended, all of these bills are still anti-gun bills which do nothing to address crime and violence.

SB 347, the “no guns in schools” bill has had its language changed but will still ban concealed carry in virtually all schools. No has provided a single example of a crime committed by a CHL holder in a school in Oregon…ever.

SB 699 now requires that CHL holders keep their firearms “concealed from view” while in public buildings. The only apparent explanation for why this should be required is that some people are “offended” by or “distressed” at the sight of a firearm in civilian hands.  Ironically , we don’t require licenses for open carry, only for concealed carry. Now, because some people have phobias and irrational fears, we are forcing people give up their rights so no one’s “feelings are hurt. There are many things that offend many people. Are we going to outlaw everything anyone objects to?

SB 700  still requires that you get police permission before giving a gun to your best friend or many family members. It also requires that you obtain forms from the State Police and keep them for 5 years if you transfer a firearm. The fact is, the background check system is already failing on a regular basis and people are delayed sometimes for months because of its regular errors. Expanding this system is a terrible idea.

Finally, SB 796 has been amended to outlaw online firearms classes. Why? No one seems to know. Ivy League Universities offer online course and college degrees are offered for them. Oregon has a charter school that is completely online. Online education is the wave of the future, it provides a far greater range of instructors than in-person teaching can and there have been exactly zero problems with people who have learned gun safety online. This bill is another idea whose time has clearly not come.

It’s essential that you contact Senator Roblan before tomorrow’s work session and urge him to vote no on all of these bills.

Contact info and a sample message follow. Feel free to modify this message.

Senator Arnie Roblan
503-986-1705
Sen.ArnieRoblan@state.or.us

______________________________________________________

Dear Senator Roblan,

The anti-gun bills you will be voting on tomorrow are no better in their amended form than they were when first drafted.
They solve no problems, address no issues and serve only to harass the law-abiding.
I urge you to continue to stand up for the rights and freedoms of  Oregon’s gun owners and not pass any bill whose only purpose is to make certain people feel good while accomplishing nothing of real value.

Yours

Posted on

ANTI-GUN BILLS EDGE FORWARD

04.16.13

 

Although none of the anti-gun bills scheduled for today actually moved out of committee, we have now seen the latest amendments for the bills.

SB 700, the “universal background check” bill would be amended to add to the list of people you could transfer a firearm to without asking permission of the police.

Previous amendments listed specific people who could receive a firearm and this amendment adds to that list by including step-children and “domestic partners.”

The bill will still prevent you from giving a gun to your favorite niece or a friend you’ve known for 30 years. Of course, this new rule will be completely ignored by all criminals, once again only harassing the law-abiding.

It a moment that can only be described as surreal, Senator Jackie Dingfelder sought to denigrate the idea that you should be allowed to give your son or daughter a firearm by reminding the room that the Connecticut shooter “got the gun from his parents” (sic)  No mention was made that he got it by shooting his mother in the face, something this bill, will not, of course, address.

SB 699, which started life as an attempt to ban concealed carry in the Capitol, has been amended several times.  This latest amendment would only allow concealed carry in a “public building” if the firearm was “concealed from view.”

A previous amendment required the firearm be “completely concealed.”  This new term does little to make the bill any better since in neither case was “concealed” or “completely concealed” defined.

Does the outline of a handgun printing through a jacket mean it’s not concealed? If  a person catches a glimpse of your gun when an outer garment is brushed aside are you now guilty of a felony?

SB 347, the “no guns in schools” bill has been amended once again. The latest version changes the way gun owners will be banned from schools. Instead of writing policies “allowing” CHL holders onto school property, now it requires that the school write a policy to forbid CHL holders it they want to keep them out. Again, it allows schools, if they choose to, to require that you unholster your firearm and place it in a school provided “safe.”  Why any school would encourage people to handle a firearm when it is safely holstered is anyone’s guess.

The new amendment (dash 8) also allows a parent to pick up or drop off a child while in possession of a firearm, but they may not come inside the building. This is absurd.  No one can explain why a licensed, rational, law-abiding parent can be trusted right up to the door, but after stepping across that line becomes a dangerous lunatic. Furthermore, no provision is made for grandparents or any other family member to pick-up or drop off a child. More pointless and unnecessary attacks on your rights.

Finally, we have seen amendments to SB 796.  The “dash 6” amendments once again change the required course of fire for new CHL applicants and now specify that a person may only attempt to qualify 3 times in a year. No mention is made in the bill on how this will be enforced. This may NOT be the amendment the committee will consider since at today’s work session Chairman Prozanski described a different amendment (not yet posted) that would remove the firing requirements and instead outlaw “on-line” training, and require a “live” instructor.  This, of course, would greatly impact people who live in places where firearms instructors are few and far between. We have seen no examples of why this new demand is needed.  As more and more classes and training move to the online environment, this is a great leap backward. Why limit the types of classes available when an online class by a world class instructor could be as good or better than a class with a “live” teacher? This bill provides fewer choices and greater expense. Another solution seeking a problem.

The bills have been held over until tomorrow for action but could very well be pushed back to Thursday or even Thursday night.  In short, there is nothing here that is good for gun owners and we need to keep the heat on.

 

Please contact the Senate Judiciary Committee and ask for a “no” vote on all four bills.

 

https://www.oregonfirearms.org/activist-toolbox/the-home-lobbyist/2013-senate-judiciary-committee

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

WORK SESSIONS TOMORROW ON ANTI-GUN BILLS

OFF ALERT 04.15.13

Happy Tax Day.

 

This is the day Bill Clinton urged us to make our “patriotic contributions.”  But tomorrow is the day that Senate Judiciary Chairman Floyd Prozanski will attempt to advance his attacks on gun rights.

 

Tomorrow, “work sessions” are scheduled for Senate Bills 347,699, 700 and 796.  Each of these bills attack  legitimate gun owners while ignoring criminals and madmen. Each is designed to harass the law abiding.

 

Since all of these bills have already received “public hearings” no public testimony will be taken at the “work session.”  Of course, these bills are likely to be changed dramatically at the work session so the “public testimony” previously taken will not reflect what will likely be in these bills. But if these bills are voted on tomorrow, there will be no opportunity for the public to comment on what they have become before a vote in committee. That’s the way it works in Salem.

 

The reason we were told these bills were moved back to tomorrow was to allow time for amendments to be drafted.  As of today, Monday afternoon, those amendments were still not available to the public or presumably to the Republican members of the committee.

 

Should these bills actually be dealt with tomorrow, most of the people voting on them will have had virtually no time to review the amendments. And you the public will have literally no time to review them until after the vote in committee.

 

There is still time to contact the members of the Senate Judiciary and express your opposition to these very bad bills.  They can be reached here.

 

For more info and talking points on these bills, please use this link.

 

Please note, the starting time for this work session has changed from 8AM to 8:30 AM.   This is significant since numerous bills have been added to the schedule and, as of now, the gun bills are scheduled to be dealt with last.  This means that it is entirely possible that they won’t be dealt with tomorrow. There is no way to predict this.

 

Since there is no opportunity for public input, you may want to consider just watching the event online.

 

You can do that at the following link.

 

You’ll want to tune into Room 343.

 

Don’t forget that on Wednesday, the same committee is due to have public hearings on two gun related bills, SB 696 and 713. For more information on changes coming to SB 696 please see this alert.

 

 

We have no idea what they are planning for SB 713 which would extend the places a “firearms training facility” could be located.

 

Stay tuned.