Posted on

02.17.14 Two Gun Bills Pass The House

02.17.14
Two gun related bills overwhelmingly passed in the Oregon House today. Both were supported and heavily amended by OFF.

HB 4035 allows correction officers to travel with privately owned firearms to and from work at prisons, something they are currently forbidden from doing.

It may seem beyond belief that men and women who work with dangerous populations are not allowed to defend themselves on their way to and from work.   Recently one of them was murdered when he stopped to help what he thought was a stranded motorist. Even civilians without permits do not have these restrictions.

It should be noted that this restriction is not Oregon law. It is a condition imposed on corrections officers by the Department of Corrections much as some school districts disarm the employees who are responsible for keeping little children safe at school.

OFF believes that no public employee should be forced to give up his rights simply because he takes a job with the state, but all too often this is the case. If HB 4035 passes the Senate and is signed into law by the governor, at least some corrections officers will not be facing this absurd liability.

There is one line in the bill that troubles us however. Section 3 of the bill states the following ; Section 2 of this 2014 Act applies to employment contracts entered into or renewed on or after the effective date of this 2014 Act.

We have not yet received a satisfactory answer for why this section is needed.

Furthermore, the CO’s must have Oregon CHL’s. This is not a requirement for civilians who travel with firearms.

The following House Reps voted against allowing CO’s to protect themselves going to and from work: Barnhart, Berger, Greenlick and Olson.

Carloyn Tomei was excused but voted against the bill in Committee. Corrections officers, please take note.

The other bill that passed out of the House today was HB 4068.

4068 is a bill OFF has been working on for some time. We heavily amended the original version and made considerable improvements.

What this bill does is apply the same standards for CHL eligibility to persons who had very old, or out-of-state convictions for small amounts of marijuana as for those with more recent or in-state convictions. This is a long overdue correction to a simple mistake in current law. There were no “no” votes on HB 4068, however, once again, Carolyn Tomei, who was not on the floor, did vote against the bill in committee.

Both these bills now move to the Senate where they may simply sail through or may be used as pawns and bargaining chips by Floyd Prozanski to push his stalled gun registration bill, SB 1551.

While this bill expands the State Police checks to private transfers, you should know that for a significant amount of time today, their phones were down again. At least one dealer reported getting an “approval” and a “delay” on his computer check of a well known customer for the same transfer!

As you know, in spite of Prozanski’s multiple assurances that the bill would get a vote on the Senate floor and pass, he lacked the votes to pass the bill out of his Senate Judiciary Committee and it was sent to the Rules Committee where it can be considered and amended well after the Judiciary Committee closes.

There have been numerous reports that the reason the bill went to the Rules Committee was because Senator Arnie Roblan (a previous supporter of a similar bill) balked and objected to passing a bill that lacked the votes on the floor.

If so, this was an attempt by some anti-gun Democrats to avoid going on the record on what may have been a failed attempt at gun registration. However, if Roblan reallywanted the bill to die he could have simply voted “no” instead of moving it to another committee where it remains alive.   Roblan’s “no” vote along with the two “no” votes from the Republican members of the committee would have killed the bill dead. Instead Roblan dodged the issue and now the bill is still alive.

There have also been reports that Prozanski will attempt to have the legislature refer the bill to the voters.  If he succeeds you can count on one thing. Millions and millions of dollars in out-of-state money will pour into Oregon to savage your rights and privacy.

You may recall in 2000, Ginny Burdick was able to pass a ban on private transfers at gun shows with the help of millions of dollars from out of state millionaires and, of course, Senator John McCain who helped them pass this travesty.  We cannot let that happen again.

Please consider another note to the members of the Rules Committee (listed below).

A sample cut and paste message follows.

Diane Rosenbaum
503-986-1700
Sen.DianeRosenbaum@state.or.us

Ted Ferriolli
503-986-1950
sen.tedferrioli@state.or.us

Lee Beyer
503-986-1706
Sen.LeeBeyer@state.or.us

Ginny Burdick
503-986-1718
sen.ginnyburdick@state.or.us

Bruce Starr
503-986-1715
Sen.BruceStarr@state.or.us

________________________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 1551 is now before your committee. This bill serves only as a step towards firearms confiscation.  While Senator Prozanski has claimed it would not require a background check for a loan of a firearm, your own Legislative Counsel said exactly the opposite.

While Prozanski claims to need make, model, caliber and serial number of every transferred firearm to “check for stolen guns” he can give no explanation for why those records must be kept by the transferor after the check!  Even the State Police claim they don’t do this.

The Oregon Sheriff’s Association recognizes this serves no legitimate law enforcement purpose. I urge you to pay attention to them.

Vote NO on SB 1551

____________________________________________________

This email was sent to off@oregonfirearms.org by off@oregonfirearms.org |
Oregon Firearms Federation | Box 556 | Canby | OR | 97013

 

THIS IS A TEST EMAIL ONLY.
This email was sent by the author for the sole purpose of testing a draft message. If you believe you have received the message in error, please contact the author by replying to this message. Constant Contact takes reports of abuse very seriously. If you wish to report abuse, please forward this message to abuse@constantcontact.com.
Posted on

It’s Show Time!

01.29.14

First Gun Bills Scheduled.

Two gun related bills have been scheduled for hearings in the House Judiciary Committee.

The first is HB 4035. This bill allows corrections officers to have a firearm in their personal vehicles when parked in a “department parking lot.”

The bill requires that the corrections officers have CHL’s.

The bill also requires that the firearm be “locked in a gun box inside the vehicle.”

We think corrections officers should have the same rights as everyone else so we support this, but we are a bit concerned by the term “gun box” and wonder why corrections officers will be required to have CHL’s to keep a gun locked in their car when no one else does.

But clearly the intention of this bill is good and its sponsor is House Rep Jeff Barker who has been as solid a vote for gun rights as you could ever ask for.

The bill is scheduled to be heard on Monday Feb 3. at 1pm in Room 343.

The second bill is HB 4068.

This bill is scheduled to be heard on Wednesday Feb. 5 at 1pm, also in Room 343.

This bill addresses an anomaly in Oregon law.

Currently a person with a conviction for a small amount of marijuana (or a single diversion) can still apply for a CHL, but only if the conviction was in Oregon and only if it was after 1973.

This bill is intended to expand CHL eligibility to those with old or out of state convictions.

It is modeled after a bill we drafted last year that was introduced by House Rep Kim Thatcher.   While it is not as well crafted as last year’s bill and needs some fine tuning, it’s a good step and we support it.

Oddly, this bill has as a cosponsor anti-gun Floyd Prozanski.   This bears watching. Since Floyd is the main mover behind a bill to expand Oregon’s gun registration we have to wonder what his motives are in cosponsoring this bill.  Politicians love to be able to appeal to as many people as possible. Maybe Floyd is trying to get some points with gun owners while doing all he can to ram through anti-gun legislation.

Speaking of Floyd’s anti-gun legislation, Senator Michael Dembrow, who serves on Floyd’s Senate Judiciary Committee and is part of the extreme anti-gun segment of the Oregon Senate, sent out an email today expressing his support for Prozanski’s anti-gun bill and saying “Expect a long and contentious public hearing sometime early in the session.”

Dembow is no friend of gun owners, but because he is an anti-gun insider, we assume his prediction to be accurate.

Please let the members of the House Judiciary Committee know that you support House Bills 4035 and 4068.

(Please keep in mind, Committee schedules can change at any time.)

Contact info and suggested message follow:
___________________________________________________

Dear Representative,

While not perfect, House Bills HB 4035 and 4068 simply make sense. Corrections officers should have the same right to self defense as everyone else does and people with old or out-of-state convictions for small amounts of marijuana should have the same opportunities as those with in-state and more recent convictions.  I strongly urge you to support these bills.

Yours,

__________________________________________________________

Chair Jeff Barker.                    Rep.JeffBarker@state.or.us

Representative Brent Barton    Rep.BrentBarton@state.or.us

Representative Kevin Cameron  Rep.KevinCameron@state.or.us

Representative Wally Hicks       Rep.WallyHicks@state.or.us

Representative Andy Olson      Rep.AndyOlson@state.or.us

Representative Carolyn Tomei   Rep.CarolynTomei@state.or.us

Representative Jennifer Williamson   Rep.JenniferWilliamson@state.or.us

Posted on

GUN BILL STATUS

05.05.13

For some time rumors have been flying around concerning the 4 anti-gun bills that passed out of the Senate Judiciary committee on a party line vote.

 

Senate Bills 347, 699, 700 and 796 would normally move to the Senate floor for a vote. Now, what will happen to them is anyone’s guess. We have been reliably informed that many Democrats do not want to vote on these bills, especially Democrats facing re-election. But a handful of the most zealous liberty-haters like Burdick, Prozanski and Monnes-Anderson see it as an chance to force Republicans to go on the record. The zealots hope to use that vote (which they think they will lose) against Republicans in future elections.

 

This is a strategy that cuts both ways, and some Democrats know it. At this point, it seems likely that the anti-gunners will lose a vote on the floor, but we’ll still have a recorded vote to use against them, so it may well be that there are members of both parties who would like to avoid a recorded vote.

 

As we have learned from the many incorrect rumors, we simply cannot say what will happen with these bills. Ginny Burdick is pushing for a vote, but Senate President Peter Courtney may well want these bills to be shuffled off to some other committee to die. Still, we have seen Courtney cave to Burdick’s will in the past. So we must be vigilant. This is no time to back off on the pressure.

 

On Wednesday May 8, the Senate Rules Committee will be hearing a bill that should be important to everyone.

 

While not a “gun bill,” SB 596 is  a step in the right direction for fixing some of the serious problems we have in the process of moving bills through our legislature.

 

What SB 596 does is require that when amendments are offered to bills, the legislator who is requesting the amendments must be named.

 

Currently, amendments are drafted and considered by committees and the requestors may remain anonymous.

 

This is one of many flaws in the legislative process. Amendments are often not available to the public until very late in the game. Bills are introduced as “committee bills” so the public does not know who authored them. In many cases, bills receive public testimony (often from people who have traveled great distances to be heard) then, after public testimony is closed, those same bills are completely rewritten and the public has no opportunity to express their opinions on the final bill even though it looks nothing like the bill they testified on.

 

All of these issues can be addressed by the House and Senate themselves if they choose to, but SB 596 is a good start.  The bill was requested by pro-gun Senator Alan Olsen.  Please consider sending a note of support to the Rules Committee.


Diane Rosenbaum, Chair

Ted Ferrioli, Vice-Chair

Lee Beyer

Ginny Burdick

Bruce Starr

If the above links don’t work (some internet providers cannot support these links) please send the following cut and paste message to the members of the committee.

 

Diane Rosenbaum, Chair
Ted Ferrioli, Vice-Chair
Lee Beyer
Ginny Burdick
Bruce Starr

_________________________________________

Dear Senator,

SB 596 is a long overdue step in the right direction to make our legislative process more transparent and friendly to the public.
While we still have a long way to go (for example, I believe the public should be able to testify on a bill after it’s been heavily amended) this bill would be a positive move forward.
Please pass this bill out of your committee.

Sincerely,