Posted on

04.28.08 LEGISLATOR TO INTRODUCE BILL TO PROTECT GUN OWNERS.

Representative Linda Flores Responds To Medford Mail Tribune

House Rep Linda Flores today announced her intentions to introduce legislation to protect the privacy of Oregonians with concealed handgun licenses.

Flores said “Many of these people get CHL’s because they are worried about their safety, whether it’s from a stalker, a case of domestic violence, or some other threat. Making their names, addresses and other records public might jeopardize their security.”

Flores proposed her legislation after the Medford Mail Tribune won a lawsuit to force the Jackson County Sheriff to divulge the personal information of license holders in that county.

The Tribune started seeking this information after a Jackson County teacher sued to be allowed to carry her firearm on school property. (She lost the first round of that fight but is appealing.)

The Tribune editorialized against public employees being able to carry defensive firearms and then sought the names of all license holders in the County.

Sheriff Mike Winters refused to turn over the names and the Medford Mail Tribune sued.Today on KMED radio,(scroll down for audio links) Winters said he is considering an appeal.

Now Linda Flores is seeking to protect gun owners legislatively.

Posted on

04.25.08 JUDGE TURNS OVER NAMES OF CHL HOLDERS TO ANTI-GUN NEWSPAPER.

MEDFORD NEWSPAPER GETS CHL LIST

The Medford Mail Tribune, a newspaper which has repeatedly editorialized against self defense for public employees, has won a court case to get the names, addresses and occupations of all concealed handgun license holders in Jackson County.

The newspaper demanded this information as part of series of articles attacking Medford teacher Shirley Katz.  Katz, you will remember, sued to be allowed to carry her handgun to work in a Medford school (The Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation is paying Ms. Katz’s legal bills. Her case is currently being appealed.)

Judge Philip Arnold, the same judge who ruled that public employees are not protected by Oregon’s preemption statute, ruled that Bob Hunter, the Tribune’s Editor, has a right to the personal information of CHL holders. The county sheriff, Mike Winters, had refused to turn over the information, citing privacy and safety concerns.

Hunter stated in an article on October 16,2007 “This is information bought and paid for by the public, and the public has a right to it.”

This is, of course, nonsense. Licence holders pay high fees in order to have their backgrounds checked, their pictures taken and their fingerprints placed on file like criminals. The public, (and Bob Hunter) doesn’t ute a dime.

Hunter and his staff have claimed that they don’t plan to release any names. We wonder then, why he wants them.

If the Medford Mail Tribune does publish the personal information of CHL holders, we will assume that they won’t mind if we publish the home addresses and other information about their staff.

You can contact Hunter by e-mail here bhunter@mailtribune.com or by regular mail and phone here:
Mail Tribune
P.O. Box 1108
111 N. Fir St.
Medford, OR 97501
541-776-4411

Posted on

04.24.08 THE HOLOCAUST HAPPENED TO PEOPLE LIKE US.

New York City subways are now being patrolled by police with M-16’s and MP5 machine guns.Some subway riders think it’s a “good idea.” Sound familiar?

If you have ever been in the NYC subways, you know there is no plausible tactical use for either of these weapons. Or is there?

Do you really think it can’t happen here?

Think Again.

“You mean shoot an American.”…..”yeah.”

Posted on

04.23.08 LINFIELD COLLEGE BECOMES CRIMINAL SAFE ZONE

Linfield College Becomes Haven To Criminals and Psychopaths.

In a move that can only be described as deranged Linfield College has instituted a policy that “prohibits weapons on college property, in any vehicle on college property, or at any college-sponsored event on or off campus.”

In a statement that could have been lifted from “1984” (Freedom Is Slavery, War Is Peace) Linfield College’s Director of “Campus Safety” Mike Dressel said the new policy was “needed because of the violence that has flared on other U.S. campuses.”

That this kind of Orwellian double speak is coming from an “institute of higher learning” should make students,potential students and parents shudder.

As a result of the violent acts of criminals and the mentally ill, Linfield College’s response is to institute a policy that has gotten students and staff killed and wounded across the country.

Not only does it guarantee that its students cannot defend themselves (even off campus) but then the college announces that insane policy to the world.

Colleges across the country are seeing an organized movement to eliminate these kinds of deadly policies, but in the face of the horrific crimes at other schools, Linfield now announces that its students are bait.

Linfield College is private, and as such can make whatever rules it wants. Students and parents can, of course, choose other places to spend their money.

“Rarely do we catch intruders, but we need to keep out those that we don’t know,” Dressel said. “And it”s hard to keep Linfield an open and friendly place the whole time without risking security.”
After the last incident in Larsell, students feel less safe. “The doors being propped open at that hour make me nervous,” sophomore Angelica Neidiger said. “I live on the first floor ,and I would be very vulnerable if anyone did break in with bad intentions.”

Well, with Linfield’s new policy you can just beg for mercy.

Mike Dressel can be reached at  1-503-883-2602 or by e-mail at mdressel@linfield.edu

You can see a message from Linfield’s President here. The message includes this ironic  note: “Linfield emphasizes lifelong learning, embraces diverse cultures and international study, and recognizes moral principle and the freedom of conscience.”

Unless of course your conscience advises you to refuse to be victimized.

 

Posted on

03.20.08 MEDFORD TEACHER APPEAL FILED. LEGISLATOR VOWS NEW GUN BAN.

As you know, a district court in southern Oregon ruled that teachers give up their right to protect themselves and others when they accept a job in a public school.

In a case that has received worldwide attention, Medford teacher Shirley Katz sued to overturn her school’s policy of denying the right of self defense to its employees. The Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation, with your generous support, has paid the legal fees for Ms. Katz.

Yesterday, attorney Jim Leuenberger filed a brief appealing the decision, a decision which directly contradicts the extremely plain language of Oregon law. Oregon law says, in no uncertain terms, that only the Oregon Legislature may make rules to restrict possession of firearms.

And now, we will need your help again. The costs for the case are mounting, but it’s essential that we see it through to a conclusion.

You see, the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation is not only funding Ms. Katz’s case. In addition to all our past litigation, OFEF has also come to the aid of other gun owners. We have been working to help provide funds for David Bacon, currently fighting an outrageous Federal charge.

We have provided legal aid to a gun owner who was pulled over in Portland in a “routine” traffic stop. When the officer discovered the driver had a concealed handgun license, he became incensed and threatened the driver with revocation because he had failed to inform the officer he had a license, something the driver had NO obligation to do.

He then called for “back-up” and numerous other Portland Police officers arrived to intimidate the driver, who had done nothing wrong. (In fact, even the traffic violation was dropped.) But the officer insisted he was going to arrange to revoke this man’s license. (To hear audio of the clueless cop discussing the “requirement” to volunteer that you have a CHL, click here.)

OFEF is providing legal services to this gentleman in his efforts to seek discipline for the officer in question.

OFEF is also assisting a businessman who was arrested at gunpoint by a Clackamas County Deputy Sheriff for having a handgun on the seat of his pickup. The only problem? It’s perfectly legal to have a handgun on the seat of your car. In fact, if you don’t have a CHL and there is no place in your vehicle to store a gun where it’s “not readily accessible,” having it on the seat beside you is virtually the only LEGAL way to transport a handgun. Once again, an innocent gun owner is the victim of ignorant or vindictive police.

You can see why I need your help. Contributions to OFEF are entirely tax deductible, and only together can we afford to confront the growing number of abuses against gun owners in Oregon. Remember, you could easily be next.

You can make a secure, online donation here. As I said, your donation to OFEF qualifies for a tax deduction, and with a growing number of cases of attacks on gun owners, we have never needed your generous support more.

Some legislators have already vowed to expand the restrictions on gun owners in the 2009 session. House Rep Peter Buckley of Ashland, has promised to introduce a bill to ban self-defense guns at schools, just as his cohort Ginny Burdick (503)244-1444 has tried to do over and over for years.

Buckley (541)482-9885 is apparently unaware of the number of people who have been gunned down in schools across the country because of the kind of policies he is proposing.

All this comes on the heels of the much anticipated “Heller” case which was heard on Tuesday.

While media outlets across the country have largely concluded that the majority of Justices will support an “individual right” theory of the Second Amendment, many gun rights organizations reacted in astonishment when the lawyer attempting to overturn Washington DC’s gun ban, agreed that “reasonable restrictions” on gun rights would be acceptable and that Americans had no legitimate right to own machine guns, a point directly contradicting his own reliance on the “Miller” case. Gun Owners of America expressed “shock and horror” and local organizations likened the comments to Pearl Harbor except that we were not torpedoing our own ships.

The outcome of this is far from clear. But we should assume that no matter what happens there will be much work to do to keep our rights.

The Chief of Police of Washington DC had some comments after the case that can only be described, (and then only with great generosity) as incoherent.

There is no question that DC has a serious issue with the quality of the people it puts in positions of power. We believe we may have already found their next Chief.

Posted on

03.18.08 HELLER CASE HEARD

The ground breaking Second Amendment “Heller ” case was heard today by the US Supreme Court.

Alan Gura, who argued on behalf of Dick Heller, a Washington DC security guard who wanted to be allowed to own a handgun, made some peculiar and perhaps astonishing, assertions.

In defense of the right to own a handgun, Gura (who we have met and seems to be an intelligent and competent attorney) suggested that the Second Amendment did NOT protect an individual’s right to own a machine gun.

All of us who are familiar with the Miller decision, (the case usually noted as the last major Second Amendment case taken up by SCOTUS) know that any rational reading of that decision would require you to conclude that in fact, machine guns are exactly what are protected by the Second Amendment. As such, Gura’s arguments seemed extremely counterproductive and may have well undermined his own case.

The Miller decision was faulty on several grounds, not the least of which, that Miller had no representation in court and the decision was based on the mistaken belief by the court that shotguns had no military use. The ignorance of all the participants in today’s hearing of basic facts about firearms works very much against us, and may, in many ways replicate the flawed conclusions the Court came to in Miller.

For a transcript of the hearing click here.

For more info and important links, click here.

For info direct from the lawyers who argued for gun rights, click here.

KMED Radio Interview with OFF Director Kevin Starrett 03.19.08 (MP3 Format)

Posted on

02.13.08 “REAL ID LITE” PASSES HOUSE

Immediately after passing a resolution to refer mandatory government health care to the voters, the Oregon House today passed SB 1080, a “driver’s license” bill intended to move Oregon closer to compliance with the Federal mandates for a national ID card.

Sold as an effort to prevent illegals from getting driver’s licenses, it places additional burdens and privacy invasions on Americans. Numerous other states have refused to capitulate to the demands of the Department of Homeland Security and subject their citizens to the heavy hand of the Federal Government, but in Oregon, the only legislators to oppose the bill did so because they did not want to inconvenience people who are here in violation of the law.

The bill requires that you surrender a Social Security Number to apply for a driver’s license, and unlike current law, makes no exception for Americans who have chosen not to accept a Federal ID number.

Every single Republican voted in favor of the bill. The Democrats who opposed it, for the sake of illegal’s, not for the protection of Americans were:

Barnhart
Bonamici
Buckley
Cannon
Dingfelder
Gelser
Greenlick
Holvey
Kotek
MacPherson
Nathanson
Nolan
Rosenbaum
Shields
Tomei

Posted on

02.12.08 SILVER FALLS SAFE, SB 1080 MOVES FORWARD

Silver Falls Safe.

A plan that would have made Silver Falls Park off limits to gun owners has been withdrawn by its sponsor.

Citing “unintended consequences” Senator Fred Girod has dropped his efforts to turn SIlver Falls into a National Park.

It is illegal to have accessible firearms in National Parks even for people with concealed handgun licenses. We first brought this to your attention on January 13th.

Thanks to everyone who contacted Girod to voice your opposition.

Meanwhile, SB 1080 continues to race through the legislature and may be heard on the House Floor as early as tomorrow.

Although supporters in the Senate praised the bill as putting us much closer to total capitulation with the Federal REAL ID act, others continue to claim it’s nothing of the kind.

Representative Dennis Richardson has referred concerned voters to his on line newsletter where he is openly critical of Real ID, but then says ” I am actually impressed that SB 1080-1 is a good bill for Oregonians regardless of party.”

Representative Larry Galizo responded to a concerned voter with this utterly incoherent reply :”The bill is still being worked. I will continue to base my vote on the specifics of the bill when it comes before me.I appreciate you taking the time to contact me on this bill. Again, I will only vote on a bill that will balance access to credit, with worthwhile consumer protections.”

Of course the bill is NOT “still being worked.” It cannot be further amended, and the bill has nothing to do with “access to credit” or “consumer protections.” If this is the kind of diligence we can expect during this “special” session, things are worse than any of us imagined.

The dangers of out-of-control data basing of American citizens has been proven by the damage done by the Brady Bill. SB 1080 is another step towards the Brave New World of Big Brother, and there is very little time to stop it.

You can find your House Rep here.
You can write your House Rep here.

 

Posted on

02.11.08 NATIONAL ID CARD IN OREGON?

NATIONAL ID CARD COMING TO OREGON

YOUR PAPERS PLEASE.

Oregon moved a step closer to capitulating to a national ID card today as the Oregon Senate overwhelmingly approved SB 1080.

The bill was sold as method of assuring that persons who got Oregon driver’s licenses were in Oregon legally.

News reportsrepeatedly commented that the bill did not comply with the Federal “Real ID” act (The National ID Card.) However, on the Senate floor today, both Senators Bruce Starr and Rick Metsger claimed that the bill took large steps in that direction.

This bill has been racing through the legislature at remarkable speed. It passed a Senate committee and went immediately to Ways and Means. It will NOT receive a hearing in a House Committee and cannot be amended. It could be on the House floor any day.

While we agree it is essential for Oregon to change its policy of being a safe haven for law breakers and illegal aliens, this bill requires that you provide the Department of Motor Vehicles with your Social Security number before being allowed to apply for a driver’s license. Those who have chosen not to have a “government” number or force their children to get one will not be allowed to apply, even if they provide proof of legal residency like a birth certificate.

Americans, born in America, will now be compelled to give up the most regularly stolen piece of ID in order to be allowed to drive, and Oregon will be far closer to capitulating to the Federal Government’s demand for National ID.

Gun owners should be very concerned about the promotion of a national ID card. The current administration has been openly hostile to gun ownership while pushing the “Department of Homeland Security” to demand national ID. Of the current front runners for president, ALL are anti-gun. That means that the next administration will almost certainly be no friend to gun owners.

The failed Brady Bill has proven what corrupt national databases can do to harm gun rights.

National ID cards under the control of administrations hostile to gun rights promise to be a nightmare. Oregon should join the states that have the courage to stand up to the Federal Government and not capitulate to unconstitutional demands.

Please contact House Speaker Jeff Merkley and urge him not to support SB 1080.

Please also contact your own rep. You can contact them with this link:

Contact info and a suggested message follow:

Speaker Jeff Merkley
503-986-1200
rep.jeffmerkley@state.or.us

_______________________________________________

Dear Speaker Merkley,

SB 1080 has been promoted as a way to stop people who are not in the US legally from getting Oregon driver’s licenses. But its supporters on the Senate floor admitted it was really an effort to move us to compliance with “Real ID” and a National ID card.

I urge you to join other western states and refuse to capitulate to unconstitutional Federal demands that Oregonians be required to have a national id card.

Oregonians should not be subject to invasions of their privacy because the Federal Government has failed in its obligation to secure our borders.

Reject SB 1080.

Very truly yours,

____________________

Posted on

01.13.08 SILVER FALLS TO BE OFF LIMITS TO GUN OWNERS?

Silver Falls National Park?

Silver Falls State Park is a beautiful area that is just a short drive from Salem and has 14 waterfalls. If Representative Fred Girod has is way however, it will be off limits to gun owners.

Girod wants the state park turned into a National Park. Guns are forbidden in National Parks, even to people who have concealed handgun licenses.

Unfortunately, National Parks offer no refuge from crime. Just like everywhere else, people have the need, and should have the right, to defend themselves in National Parks. But in spite of years of efforts by pro-gun organizations, Congress refuses to correct the Federal law that prohibits guns in National Parks.(Please note the alert link is from 2006 and the names and addresses are no longer relevant.)

We have no doubt that a gun ban was NOT Girod’s intention. But it would be the result if he is successful.

Please contact Representative Girod and ask him to withdraw his attempts to make Silver Falls off limits to you until Congress corrects this dangerous law.

Girod’s contact information and a sample letter follow:

Representative Fred Girod
900 Court Street NE
H478
Salem OR 97301
503-986-1417
E-mail rep.fredgirod@state.or.us

Posted on

01.10.08 BUSH SIGNS NEW GUN CONTROL BILL.

Bush Signs NRA Gun Control Bill Into Law.

When George Bush JR. ran for president, the NRA promised that they would “work out of his office.”

Yesterday, in a giant victory for Sarah Brady and the National Rifle Association, Bush signed into law, a vast expansion of the Brady Bill gun restriction law.

Today, the Brady Campaign sent out an e-mail saying “The first major piece of national legislation to reduce gun violence in more than a decade was signed into law yesterday. Thank you for making this success possible.”

That extreme, anti-gun bill was resurrected by the NRA after 5 years of oblivion.

The new gun ban bill, (supported by Brady and the NRA) HR 2640, will take the failed background checks of the Brady Bill, which regularly delays or denies thousands of lawful gun purchases, and apply them to millions more gun buyers.

While the damage caused by the NRA’s duplicity cannot yet be calculated, it is clear that with each new sell out, your chances of being able to purchase the gun of your choice drop precipitously.

If you have any doubts that the gun grabbers are using this victory to push more gun bans, see here.

The sponsor of the bill wants more. Lots more. And she got her last victory with the active support of the NRA.

It’s very likely that those who would legislate away your right to defend yourself, will use the NRA’s support for new gun restrictions to promote their own gun control schemes. It’s also a near certainty that politicians will use the NRA’s support of this latest gun grab as political cover.

Thanks to the NRA’s support for the original Brady Bill, we hear from people every day who have been denied, or illegally delayed, a firearm’s purchase. It’s about to get a whole lot worse.

Posted on

01.06.08 Gun Maker Supports Gun Banner

It is truly astonishing that people in the business of making guns would support someone who wants to take them away. But Alex Robinson of Robinson Armament Co is determined to do just that.

Robinson posted an endorsement for Mitt Romney on his regularly updated website.
He has also stated :”There’s no one in the country who knows more about this subject or who can talk about it more intelligently than I can.”

When he was informed by gun owners that his support for Romney was, well, just plain nuts, he bent over backwards to give the Romney campaign an opportunity to spin their candidate’s message, much like the NRA. Now he is trying to convince gun owners to “change the minds” of the anti-gun candidates. Good luck. For more on NRA’s recent sell outs, click here.

Something go keep in mind when you buy your next rifle. On the other hand, it’s far from the first time we’ve seen this. In New York in 1989, the City Council attempted to pass an “assault weapon” ban. They did not succeed until 1992. But when the first attempt was made, a list of banned guns was created. Oddly, Ruger’s Mini 14 was not on the list. In what was sure to be seen as a complete coincidence, Ruger was supplying Mini-14’s to the New York City Police Department.

Posted on

12.22.07 MORE ON THE NRA/BRADY GUN CONTROL BILL.

HR 2640, The NRA’s Latest “Victory.”

“We commend the United States Congress for its action today to strengthen the Brady background check system.”

Those were the words of Paul Helmke the President of the Brady gun ban group. The action to which he was referring, as you no doubt know, was the passage of HR 2640, in lighting moves with no debate and no recorded votes.

Both the US Senate and the US House passed this bill on December 19th under “unanimous consent” agreements. That means it was not even discussed. In order for this to happen, the leadership of both parties had to agree to allow it.

We are not surprised politicians would push more gun control with no accountability. But what is greatly troubling is that the National Rifle Association was the primary force behind this latest attack on gun rights.

The NRA’s spin machine is operating at full capacity praising the passage of a bill written by the most anti-gun members of Congress.

The bill expands and extends the failed Brady background check system, a gun registration scheme which has cost thousands of qualified people the ability to purchase a firearm.

It is amazing the NRA would revive a bill that was going nowhere just to give more power to the people who are denying legitimate purchases now.

You will recall the NRA supported the original Brady Bill because they approved of background checks for gun buys. That a “pro-gun” organization could support prior restraint of a right is bad enough, but now, years after this system has been in place, the NRA joins forces with an organization that has raised millions to strip Americans of their Second Amendment right in order to expand this dangerous law.

The NRA has insisted that this bill, rammed though when they hoped no one was watching, is going to benefit gun owners. On their website, the NRA uses the following quote to prove what a great deal this is for gun owners:
“Provides that if a person applies for relief from disabilities and the agency fails to act on the application within a year—for any reason, including lack of funds—the applicant can seek immediate review of his application in federal court.”

A year? A person who applies for relief has to wait a year before they can demand that some action be taken? That’s a mighty long time to wait for the right to have a firearm …especially if you need one. Oh, and then they get to go to court, to “seek” review. At their own expense of course.

Aside from the fact that the enemies of gun rights are crowing about this “victory” the biggest problem,(lost in NRA’s extensive justification for what CBS News called the first major new gun control bill in more than a decade,) is a simple reality the NRA refuses to acknowledge.

This bill turns over more power and more information to the very agencies which have used existing law to deny the rights of Americans or make it impossibly expensive to exercise those rights.

In Oregon, countless qualified buyers are denied purchases because of the intentional obstruction of government agencies who maintain these records. But it is even worse than that.

The original Brady Bill allowed for an end to the mandatory waiting periods when the availability of records allowed for an “instant” background check. We have long since passed that point, but for far too many people the background check is anything but “instant” stretching to weeks and months for many. How can the NRA and its apologists believe that the abysmal record keeping (or the outright obstruction of some agencies) is going to improve by handing these bureaucracies more power and personal information?

The NRA, in an article entitled “Clearing The Air On The Instant Check Bill “ said the following:

“In the late 1990s, gun buyers often experienced ridiculous delays while NICS sorted through cases of mistaken identity or incomplete police records. Many purchasers were wrongly denied and forced to go through a cumbersome appeals process. At the same time, state officials testified before Congress about woefully incomplete records they provide to NICS–a problem confirmed in recent reports by the U.S. Department of Justice”

Well someone needs to alert these guardians of our gun rights, that nothing’s changed. And now we are well passed the 1990’s. Gun owners are still being delayed and denied and still face cumbersome appeals processes. If you are delayed without cause, it’s your tough luck. The so called “safeguards” built into the law are meaningless and ignored. Sure, the law says if you don’t get an approval within three days, a firearms transfer may take place, but just try it.

Now NRA wants to solve the problems they created with Brady by giving us more of the same. They are telling us that the government bureaucrats will now be using accurate records, we should all be thankful and this is a great step forward.

In the world of gun rights, “good intentions” don’t cut it . As poorly kept and abused as the records of criminal behavior are, at least crimes are generally easy to quantify. “Mental illness” is far less black and white. You will recall the Bush efforts to screen the entire US population for “mental illness.”

The NRA has joined forces with politicians and organizations who have declared their intention to end gun ownership in this country. They have rammed through legislation that requires that more records be handed over to people who have proven they cannot be trusted with them. They have asked that gun owners believe that the same people who defunded the process to allow people to get their gun rights back under the current law won’t defund the lengthy process to get your rights back under this new law.

If you believe that more records in the hands of more government operators is a good idea, you may want to think about the first act of the Clintons when they took over the White House. The FBI record scandal proved beyond any doubt how unscrupulous and criminal political operatives can bypass the law to ruin people’s lives.

In an alert title “Outrage of the Week” the NRA has invited readers to share their “weekly outrage.”
They say “If you see something that you feel would be a good candidate for the “Outrage of the Week!” section, please send it to: freedomsvoice@nrahq.org.”

We think the sneaky passage of NRA/Schumer/McCarthy bill more than qualifies.
800-392-8683 – Grassroots Hotline

Posted on

12.21.07 HR 2640, The NRA’s Latest “Victory.”

“We commend the United States Congress for its action today to strengthen the Brady background check system.”

Those were the words of Paul Helmke the President of the Brady gun ban group. The action to which he was referring, as you no doubt know, was the passage of HR 2640, in lighting moves with no debate and no recorded votes.

Both the US Senate and the US House passed this bill on December 19th under “unanimous consent” agreements. That means it was not even discussed. In order for this to happen, the leadership of both parties had to agree to allow it.

We are not surprised politicians would push more gun control with no accountability. But what is greatly troubling is that the National Rifle Association was the primary force behind this latest attack on gun rights.

The NRA’s spin machine is operating at full capacity praising the passage of a bill written by the most anti-gun members of Congress.

The bill expands and extends the failed Brady background check system, a gun registration scheme which has cost thousands of qualified people the ability to purchase a firearm.

It is amazing the NRA would revive a bill that was going nowhere just to give more power to the people who are denying legitimate purchases now.

You will recall the NRA supported the original Brady Bill because they approved of background checks for gun buys. That a “pro-gun” organization could support prior restraint of a right is bad enough, but now, years after this system has been in place, the NRA joins forces with an organization that has raised millions to strip Americans of their Second Amendment right in order to expand this dangerous law.

The NRA has insisted that this bill, rammed though when they hoped no one was watching, is going to benefit gun owners. On their website, the NRA uses the following quote to prove what a great deal this is for gun owners:
“Provides that if a person applies for relief from disabilities and the agency fails to act on the application within a year—for any reason, including lack of funds—the applicant can seek immediate review of his application in federal court.”

A year? A person who applies for relief has to wait a year before they can demand that some action be taken? That’s a mighty long time to wait for the right to have a firearm …especially if you need one. Oh, and then they get to go to court, to “seek” review. At their own expense of course.

Aside from the fact that the enemies of gun rights are crowing about this “victory” the biggest problem,(lost in NRA’s extensive justification for what CBS News called the first major new gun control bill in more than a decade,) is a simple reality the NRA refuses to acknowledge.

This bill turns over more power and more information to the very agencies which have used existing law to deny the rights of Americans or make it impossibly expensive to exercise those rights.

In Oregon, countless qualified buyers are denied purchases because of the intentional obstruction of government agencies who maintain these records. But it is even worse than that.

The original Brady Bill allowed for an end to the mandatory waiting periods when the availability of records allowed for an “instant” background check. We have long since passed that point, but for far too many people the background check is anything but “instant” stretching to weeks and months for many. How can the NRA and its apologists believe that the abysmal record keeping (or the outright obstruction of some agencies) is going to improve by handing these bureaucracies more power and personal information?

The NRA, in an article entitled “Clearing The Air On The Instant Check Bill “ said the following:

“In the late 1990s, gun buyers often experienced ridiculous delays while NICS sorted through cases of mistaken identity or incomplete police records. Many purchasers were wrongly denied and forced to go through a cumbersome appeals process. At the same time, state officials testified before Congress about woefully incomplete records they provide to NICS–a problem confirmed in recent reports by the U.S. Department of Justice

Well someone needs to alert these guardians of our gun rights, that nothing’s changed. And now we are well passed the 1990’s. Gun owners are still being delayed and denied and still face cumbersome appeals processes. If you are delayed without cause, it’s your tough luck. The so called “safeguards” built into the law are meaningless and ignored. Sure, the law says if you don’t get an approval within three days, a firearms transfer may take place, but just try it.

Now NRA wants to solve the problems they created with Brady by giving us more of the same. They are telling us that the government bureaucrats will now be using accurate records, we should all be thankful and this is a great step forward.

In the world of gun rights, “good intentions” don’t cut it . As poorly kept and abused as the records of criminal behavior are, at least crimes are generally easy to quantify. “Mental illness” is far less black and white. You will recall the Bush efforts to screen the entire US population for “mental illness.”

The NRA has joined forces with politicians and organizations who have declared their intention to end gun ownership in this country. They have rammed through legislation that requires that more records be handed over to people who have proven they cannot be trusted with them. They have asked that gun owners believe that the same people who defunded the process to allow people to get their gun rights back under the current law won’t defund the lengthy process to get your rights back under this new law.

If you believe that more records in the hands of more government operators is a good idea, you may want to think about the first act of the Clintons when they took over the White House. The FBI record scandal proved beyond any doubt how unscrupulous and criminal political operatives can bypass the law to ruin people’s lives.

In an alert title “Outrage of the Week” the NRA has invited readers to share their “weekly outrage.”
They say “If you see something that you feel would be a good candidate for the “Outrage of the Week!” section, please send it to: freedomsvoice@nrahq.org.”

We think the sneaky passage of NRA/Schumer/McCarthy bill more than qualifies.
800-392-8683 – Grassroots Hotline

Posted on

12.19.07 NRA AND BRADY CAMPAIGN PASS GUN GRAB THROUGH SENATE

NRA/ Brady Campaign Gun Control Bill Passes Senate and House

UPDATE. SELL OUT COMPLETED.

As was predicted by our friends at the National Association For Gun RIghts, the Senate chose this busy time, when they hoped no one was paying attention, to ram through the NRA and Brady Campaign supported gun grab, HR 2640.

As we have told you, this bill will vastly expand the failed Brady background checks, which are already denying countless legitimate gun purchases.

In a press release issued today, the anti-gun “Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violencesaid “We commend the United States Senate for its action today to strengthen the Brady background check system by passing the “NICS Improvement Act of 2007′ (H.R. 2640).

The Nation Rifle Association is now firmly in bed with the most militant gun grabbers in the country. While we have seen no press releases yet from NRA

The NRA has issued this press release. The NRA and the Brady Campaign are now issueing press releases praising the same bill. If this does not give you chills, you are not paying attention.

…it is clear that they now have allied themselves with the people who have called for a complete elimination of privately owned semi-automatic firearms and countless other attacks on the Second Amendment.

As we write this, we do not have vote counts on the bill. We will post them as soon as they become available.

The bill now goes back to the House for concurrence with the Senate version. As you know, the bill originally sailed through the House on an unrecorded voice vote. The only “no” vote we know of was from Congressman (and Presidential candidate) Ron Paul.

Our last chance to kill this outrageous NRA gun grab is back in the House.

Contact info for your House member can be found here. Your House member will be the third person listed after your US Senators.

Please contact them with the simple message, “The NRA and Sarah Brady DON’T speak for me. Vote NO on HR 2640.”

There may not be much time. The bill has already been sent back to the House and if the Senate’s actions are any indication, this might get acted on before Christmas.

Please contact your Congressman right now,and if you have not already done so, please consider making a ution to our political action committee.

Too late. The House concurred in the Senate Amendments tonight. The NRA/Sarah Brady gun grab now goes to the George Bush for his signature.

(Save this alert. When this bill prevents thousands of legitimate gun purchases, the NRA will be swearing they had nothing to do with it.)

Contributions qualify for a tax credit and will help us defeat politicians who are attacking your rights. You can make a secure and easy on line donation here.

Be sure to use the drop down menu to note that your ution is for our PAC. You can learn more about the tax credit here. But don’t delay, your ution must be made before the end of the year to qualify for the 2007 tax credit. And PLEASE contact your Congressman today and tell them to vote NO on concurrence with the Senate on HR 2640.